Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Is Reportedly Non-Interior to Paclitaxel and Ifosfamide in Uterine Carcinosarcoma


Findings from a phase 3 study indicated that patients with uterine carcinosarcoma treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin experienced a better progression-free survival and non-inferior duration of overall survival vs paclitaxel plus ifosfamide.

A combination regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin resulted in a longer progression-free survival and non-inferior duration of overall survival in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma compared with those who were treated with paclitaxel and ifosfamide, according to findings from a phase 3 trial (NCT00954174) published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.1

The median overall survival (OS) for those treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin was 37 months compared with 29 months for those treated with paclitaxel and ifosfamide (HR, 0.87; 90% CI, 0.70-1.075; P <.01 for non-inferiority, P >.01 for superiority). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 months in the PC group, compared with 12 months in the paclitaxel and ifosfamide group (HR, 0.73; P <.01 for non-inferiority, P <.01 for superiority).2

This study also analyzed a small cohort of women with ovarian carcinosarcoma. The median OS for patients who received the paclitaxel and carboplatin group was 30 months and the median PFS was 15 months compared with 25 months for and 10 months, respectively, in the paclitaxel and ifosfamide group.

“Women with uterine or ovarian carcinosarcomas typically present with this very aggressive disease at a late stage and tend to have a poor prognosis. The current evidence-based standard of care is treatment with combined paclitaxel and ifosfamide, however, this treatment comes with several limitations and it was imperative to find an effective treatment alternative for women with this diagnosis,” lead author Matthew A Powell, MD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology and chief of the Division of Gynecologic Oncology at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, said in a press release.2

A total of 637 patients enrolled, including 449 eligible patients with primary uterine disease and 90 eligible patients with ovarian carcinosarcoma. The majority of patients were between 50 to 79 years old, non-Hispanic or White, and had stage I or II uterine primary disease. The median time on treatment was 16 weeks following randomization. In total, 13% of patients discontinued treatment early because of progression, with 9% refusing some or all of the treatment, and 13% discontinued because of adverse effects (AEs) or death.

In the paclitaxel and carboplatin arm, patients were given 175 mg/m2 intravenously of paclitaxel over 3 hours plus carboplatin on 1 day of each 3-week cycle for 6 to 10 cycles. If patients had previous pelvic radiotherapy, the initial dose of paclitaxel was reduced to 135 mg/m2 and could be escalated if the patient tolerated it. In the paclitaxel and ifosfamide arm, patients received 1.6 g/m2 of ifosfamide intravenously on days 1 to 3 and/or oral mesna plus paclitaxel at 135 mg/m2 with a 3-hour infusion on day 1. Patients also received Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support on days 4 to 6 of each 3-week cycles for 6 to 10 cycles.

Notably, in a one-tailed test, investigators reported that the paclitaxel and carboplatin arm was not statistically significantly superior to the paclitaxel and ifosfamide arm (P = .14). The results, even when restricting the analysis to data from the treated and eligible treated patients were consistent with the intent-to-treat population (HR = .87 and 0.90, respectively).

A total of 259 deaths occurred in the uterine carcinosarcoma group, and 61 in the ovarian carcinosarcoma group. Most deaths were attributed to disease, but 2 in the paclitaxel and carboplatin group were from treatment.

Patients with stage III or IV uterine carcinosarcoma, and in the paclitaxel and carboplatin arm had a longer OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.01) and PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.88) compared with the paclitaxel and ifosfamide arm; the difference was only found to be statistically significant for PFS.

In the cohort of eligible patients with uterine carcinosarcoma, 13% had received previous radiation therapy, including 10% of patients with stage I, 15% with stage II, 13% with stage III, 4% with stage IV, and 45% with recurrent disease. Forty patients with stage I to III disease received radiation prior to the trial. A post-hoc analysis was used to determine the effects of treatment with radiation prior to the study. Investigators found that PFS and OS were similar between those who did and those who did not receive radiation therapy.

Investigators did not find new safety signals in this trial. Grade 3 to 5 hematologic toxicity was higher in the paclitaxel and carboplatin arm (82%) compared with the paclitaxel and ifosfamide arm (50%; P <.01). AEs of grade 3 to 5 were observed in 12% of patients in the paclitaxel and ifosfamide arm and 7% in the paclitaxel and carboplatin arm (P>.10).

At baseline, 94% of patients completed the assessment, with 86% completing an assessment during cycle 3, 84% during cycle 6, and 74% 30 weeks after cycle 1. In terms of patient-reported quality of life in the uterine carcinosarcoma group, patient-reported neurotoxicity symptoms were not significantly different between treatment arms. In both arms, a decreased quality of life and increase in neurotoxic symptoms were reported.


1. Powell MA, Filiaci VL, Hensley ML, et al. Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus paclitaxel and ifosfamide in patients with carcinosarcoma of the uterus or ovary: an NRG Oncology trial. J Clin Oncol. Published online January 10, 2022. doi:10.1200/JCO.21.02050

2. NRG Oncology trial data concludes paclitaxel and carboplatin should be considered the standard of care as first-line treatment for women with uterine carcinosarcoma. News Release. NRG Oncology. January 11, 2022. Accessed January 13, 2022.

Related Videos
Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG discusses the use of new antibody drug conjugates for treating patients with various gynecologic cancers.
Developing novel regimens may continue to improve survival outcomes of patients with advanced cervical cancer following the FDA approval of pembrolizumab and chemoradiation, says Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD.
Treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemoradiation appears to be well tolerated with no detriment to quality of life among those with advanced cervical cancer.
Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD, says that pembrolizumab in combination with chemoradiation will be seamlessly incorporated into her institution’s treatment of those with FIGO 2014 stage III to IVA cervical cancer following the regimen’s FDA approval.
Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD, says that paying attention to the quality of chemoradiotherapy is imperative to feeling confident about the potential addition of pembrolizumab for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Guidelines from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology may help with managing the ongoing chemotherapy shortage in the treatment of patients with gynecologic cancers, according to Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG, notes that sometimes there is a need to substitute cisplatin for carboplatin, and vice versa, to best manage gynecologic cancers during the chemotherapy shortage.
Findings from the phase 3 MIRASOL trial support mirvetuximab soravtansine as a standard treatment option for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, according to Ritu Salani, MD.
Trastuzumab deruxtecan appears to elicit ‘impressive’ responses among patients with HER2-positive gynecologic cancers regardless of immunohistochemistry in the phase 2 DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial.
Ritu Salani, MD, highlights the possible benefit of a novel targeted therapy and autologous tumor vaccine in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, and in the maintenance setting after treatment for platinum-sensitive disease.
Related Content