Peter Humphrey, MD, PhD, Discusses Histology and Clinical Trial Enrollment in RCC

Video

At the 15th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies, Peter Humphrey, MD, PhD, spoke about how enrollment for specific trials in renal cell carcinoma may incorporate a patient’s tumor histology.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Peter Humphrey, MD, PhD, professor of pathology and director of Genitourinary Pathology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, about how clinicians can best identify patients with renal cell carcinoma who may be eligible to enroll on a clinical trial. Humphrey spoke about this topic at the 15th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies, hosted by Physicians’ Education Resource®, LLC (PER®).

Transcript:

I can’t really speak to clinical trials, there’s so many ongoing. I think the oncologists [may] be the best doctors to speak to that. I would say that as far as trials, it is important to know that histology can influence enrollment. For example, there were trials presented [at the conference] where the enrollment in 1 trial was based upon a diagnosis of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Other times, it’s [based on] enrollment of clear cell versus non–clear cell renal cell [carcinoma]. Again, knowing the classification of renal cell carcinoma can help [physicians] better understand what the specific aim of the trial might be in targeting a specific type of renal cell carcinoma.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Related Content