Risk of transplantrelated mortality doesn’t increase with cord blood

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 18 No 2
Volume 18
Issue 2

This study shows that in patients with acute leukemia, cord blood can be a good alternative,” said Dr. Keating, director of the division of hematology at the University of Toronto.

This study shows that in patients with acute leukemia, cord blood can be a good alternative,” said Dr. Keating, director of the division of hematology at the University of Toronto.

“For stem cell transplants, often there is some urgency, and finding a suitable peripheral blood or bone marrow donor can take a while. The advantage of cord blood is that these cells are typed and cryopreserved, so access to them could be faster.”

In a patient with acute myeloid leukemia in second remission, where time may be important, “it would be appropriate to do a cord blood transplant,” added Dr. Keating, who is also a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto.

Among some physicians, he said, “there may be a perception that using cord blood for stem cell transplants is riskier than peripheral blood or bone marrow sources. Certainly, the immunologic recovery is slowest with cord blood, and patients could thus be more susceptible to infection. But in terms of transplant-related mortality, cord blood is roughly the same when compared with peripheral blood or bone marrow sources.”

Related Videos
Increasing screening for younger individuals who are at risk of colorectal cancer may help mitigate the rising early incidence of this disease.
Laparoscopy may reduce the degree of pain or length of hospital stay compared with open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer.