Routine Genomic Testing in Cancer Patients May Be Feasible

Article

Widespread routine genomic testing is feasible in patients with advanced cancer, though there may be a clinical benefit to only a subset of patients.

[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"60209","attributes":{"alt":"Olivier Tredan, MD, PhD, presenting the results at a press briefing","class":"media-image","id":"media_crop_6557110452798","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"7586","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"width: 620px; height: 310px;","title":"Olivier Tredan, MD, PhD, presenting the results at a press briefing","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]

CHICAGO-Although a growing number of patients with advanced cancers receive some genomic testing, comprehensive genomic testing is not yet routine care. A French study of patients with advanced cancer (abstract LBA100) suggests that widespread routine genomic testing is feasible; however, there may be a clinical benefit to only a subset of patients at this time. These results were presented at the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held June 2–6.

Lead study author Olivier Tredan, MD, PhD, chair of the department of medical oncology at the Centre Léon Bérard in Lyon, France, said that the technology is widely available and requires only a small amount of DNA, and so, theoretically, genomic testing could be done for all oncology patients. “Routine molecular profiling is feasible and allows the identification of alterations in order to offer additional targeted treatment options,” Tredan said.

Tredan presented the latest findings from an ongoing clinical trial that uses genomic profiling of tumors to guide treatment decisions for patients with advanced cancer. In this trial, DNA from tumor samples is analyzed by next-generation sequencing of 69 cancer-related genes and whole genome array comparative genomic hybridization. The molecular tumor board meets weekly to review genomic testing results and, if actionable mutations are found, provides recommendations for molecularly targeted therapies. Patients are subsequently matched with either commercially available drugs or agents tested in early clinical trials.

Currently, 2,676 patients have enrolled in the study, and 1,944 tumors were analyzed, including colorectal, gynecologic, breast, brain, and head and neck cancer, as well as sarcoma. Actionable mutations were found in 1,004 (52%) tumor samples. The analysis showed that 609 patients had only one actionable mutation and 394 had two or more (up to 6). The most common actionable pathway was the PI3K/mTOR pathway.

The molecular tumor board recommended molecularly targeted treatments to 676 patients (35% of 1,944 tested) based on availability of drugs hitting either the target protein or the pathway activated by the target. Among these 676 patients, 143 received the recommended treatment. The 5-year survival rate was higher among patients who received the recommended treatment vs those who did not (34.8% vs 28.1%). There were 533 patients who were not able to receive the recommended treatment due to poor health/rapid progression of the cancer, not meeting eligibility criteria for a clinical trial, or difficulty obtaining off-label commercial medicines.

Researchers compared overall survival rates for the 143 patients who received targeted therapies based on genomic testing and 502 patients who did not. At 3 years, 53.7% of patients who received the recommended targeted therapy were alive, compared with 46.1% of patients who did not.

Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content