Combined pelvic radiation therapy and intrauterine brachytherapy are frequently administered for locally advanced cervical and vaginal cancer. These therapies result in sexual dysfunction, namely vaginal shortening and decreased lubrication induced by fibrosis, stenosis, and mucosal atrophy.
Combined pelvic radiation therapy and intrauterine brachytherapy are frequently administered for locally advanced cervical and vaginal cancer. These therapies result in sexual dysfunction, namely vaginal shortening and decreased lubrication induced by fibrosis, stenosis, and mucosal atrophy.1-3 Vaginal dilator use is recommended to counter these untoward effects, yet many women fail to use this intervention. It is often perceived as intrusive, embarrassing, and foreign to usual measures of self-care. Researchers in the Netherlands undertook a prospective, longitudinal pilot study whereby four oncology nurses were trained to conduct an educational intervention with gynecologic patients undergoing pelvic radiation therapy and brachytherapy.4 The nurses received education from a number of interdisciplinary colleagues (i.e., sex therapists, psychologists, radiation, and gynecologic oncologists) and this education was delivered via lecture, role play, and group discussion. A treatment manual was developed for the nurses and they received monthly, 2-hour group supervision from the psychologists/sexual therapists during the duration of the study. Additionally, an educational booklet was developed for patients specific to sexual compromise associated with treatment. Outcome measures included frequency of dilator use, sexual functioning, and sexual, psychological, and relational distress measured at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months post-therapy. Of those who completed the longitudinal assessment, sexual function improved between 1 and 6 months with further improvement evidenced at 1 year following treatment. Nurse-led sexual rehabilitation interventions which include instruction on dilator use, discussion of sexual issues, anxieties and coping responses during recovery, proved advantageous to patients participating in this pilot study. This research offers testimony to the efficacy of nurse-driven interventions to manage the treatment-specific sequelae associated with radiation therapy. Should these interventions be integrated into standardized care plans for women with gynecologic malignancies receiving radiation therapy? The answer is not yes, but how. References