Stephen V. Liu, MD, Discussed the Importance of Testing for Oncogenic Drivers in Frontline NSCLC

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Stephen V. Liu, MD, at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting to talk about pralsetinib for patients with non–small cell lung cancer harboring RET fusions and adequate biomarker testing in the frontline.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Stephen V. Liu, MD, regarding his poster presentation of the phase 1/2 ARROW trial (NCT03037385) featuring pralsetinib (Gavreto) in patients with RET fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are receiving treatment in the frontline setting.

In addition to efficacy data for pralsetinib in this indication, the data served to inform clinicians about the importance of genomic testing in the first line for patients with NSCLC, Liu said.

Transcript:

When we see these high response rates—88% [with pralsetinib]—for relatively rare subsets of lung cancer, it reminds us that it is increasingly critical to be sure we’re testing patients’ cancers appropriately and thoroughly. Now we have drugs that are real difference makers, not just in this subset [with RET fusions], but many others. It’s only possible if we identify the mutations and fusions so we can afford patients those benefits. I think it would be tragic for this option to go unused for someone with RET fusion–positive lung cancer because the cancer hadn’t been adequately tested.

It’s more important these days because the alternative therapy is immunotherapy in some form or another, which is not really an effective treatment for RET fusion­–positive lung cancer. If we miss this biomarker, if we do incomplete testing, or skip some markers, we missed the opportunity to give a well-tolerated, extremely effective oral therapy. Instead, we give an expensive immunotherapy agent that is very unlikely to work. It’s very important we find these alterations—if we’re not testing for [RET fusions then we] can’t find them. If you’re not doing complete testing, then it really is difficult to give the proper treatment for patients with lung cancer.

References

Curigliano G, Gainor JF, Greisinger F, et al. Safety and efficacy of pralsetinib in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Update from the ARROW trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):9089. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9089

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Related Content