TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 43-44

TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study

TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study

Background

Despite the wide range of available treatment options for patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, optimal treatment after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) remains unclear. Several mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6i have been postulated, including increased expression of Aurora kinase A (AURKA), a key regulator of mitosis associated with poor prognosis in multiple tumor types. Further implicated in CDK 4/6i resistance, high c-Myc or RB1 loss of function (LOF) have been associated with transcriptional co-regulation or synthetic lethality, respectively, with AURKA. Alisertib is a highly selective, reversible, ATP-competitive, orally administered, small-molecule AURKA inhibitor with antiproliferative activity in HR+ breast cancer-derived cell lines and breast cancer xenograft models. Greater alisertib sensitivity has been reported in models with elevated AURKA or c-Myc expression, or RB1 LOF. Clinically, alisertib showed efficacy in phase 1 and 2 trials, including objective response rates (ORRs) of 19.6% to 20% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.4 months to 5.6 months alone or with fulvestrant in patients with HR+/HER2–, endocrine-resistant MBC. The most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia, anemia, and leukopenia.

Methods

ALISCA-Breast1 (NCT06369285) is a randomized phase 2 study. Primary objective: to determine the optimal alisertib dose level administered with selected endocrine therapy (ET) for use in future studies based on observed safety (AEs, serious AEs per CTCAE v5.0) and efficacy (ORR, duration of response, disease-control rate, PFS, overall survival). Secondary objectives: to identify biomarkers correlating with efficacy; to evaluate alisertib pharmacokinetics (PK). Key inclusion criteria: age 18 years or older; ECOG performance status 0 or 1; confirmed HR+, HER2–, recurrent or metastatic breast adenocarcinoma not amenable to curative therapy; available tumor tissue for biomarker analyses; progression on or after 2 or more prior ET lines in recurrent or metastatic setting; prior CDK4/6i with ET in recurrent or metastatic setting; 1 or more measurable target lesion per RECIST v1.1. Patients who are premenopausal are eligible if amenable to treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. Key exclusion criteria: prior chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic setting; bone-only disease not meeting the measurability definition per RECIST v1.1; prior AURKA-specific or pan-Aurora-targeted agents; active infection; patients who are immunocompromised; unstable brain metastases; uncontrolled symptomatic visceral disease. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1:1 to alisertib 30 mg, 40 mg, or 50 mg orally twice daily on days 1 to 3, 8 to 10, and 15 to 17 every 28 days and combined with physician’s choice of anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, fulvestrant, or tamoxifen not previously used in the recurrent or metastatic setting or progressed upon in the adjuvant setting. Up to 50 patients will be enrolled per arm at multiple centers in the US and Europe. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Stratification factors: time to recurrence/progression after initiating CDK4/6i therapy (< 12 months or ≥ 12 months); presence of visceral disease (yes/no). All patients will undergo sparse PK sampling. Tumor tissue will be centrally assessed for biomarkers, including but not limited to RB1, MYC, TP53, ESR1, PI3K/AKT pathway, HER2, and AURKA genomic alterations and/or expression levels. The study is expected to determine the optimal alisertib dose to combine with ET and may identify biomarker(s) that define patients deriving the greatest benefit from alisertib-containing therapy.

Articles in this issue

TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature
TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study
TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study
106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)
106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)
107 Neratinib-Based Combination Treatments for Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases
107 Neratinib-Based Combination Treatments for Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Related Content