Treatment May Be Tailored by Detecting NRG1 Fusions Through NGS for NSCLC and Other Solid Malignancies


Treatment strategies might be better tailored through the use of next-generation sequencing to detect NRG1 fusions.

Findings from a study in a Chinese patient population indicated that combining next-generation sequencing with a unique algorithm may be effective in detecting NRG1 fusions and creating a precise treatment strategy for patients with solid tumors.

Next-generation panel sequencing and a unique algorithm demonstrated the advantage of detecting NRG1 fusions and providing structure information of partners, which could ultimately guide more precise therapeutic options, according to data from a study done in Chinese patients with solid tumors published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

A total of 47 patients included in the research were found to harbor NRG1 fusions, including 0.19% of patients with NSCLC (n = 25/13089). NRG1 fusions were detected at a frequency of 0.30% (n = 3/973) in bone sarcoma, 0.16% (n = 3/1850) in breast carcinoma, 0.14% (n = 3/2098) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and 0.07% (n = 3/4344) in colorectal carcinoma.

Previous reports detailed a 0.12% prevalence of NRG1 fusions in solid tumors among the Western population. Although these fusions are rare overall, they are most commonly detected in those with NSCLC. To date, research evaluating the frequency of NGR1 fusions in Chinese patients with solid tumors has been limited. With the current study, investigators set out to explore this further in this population.

To do this, investigators collected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and matched peripheral blood from Chinese patients with solid tumors. The samples were evaluated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using a panel assay of 450 cancer genes and an RNA panel assay. Investigators analyzed somatic variants using CAP/CLIA-certified workflows, including Single Nucleotide Variant, Copy Number Variation, large insertion and deletions, and gene rearrangements.

Among the 47 patients found to harbor NRG1 fusions, the median age was 57 years (range, 8-86), and 51% were male. Additionally, 44.7% of patients had advanced disease of at least stage III. The median tumor mutational burden was 3.3 muts/Mb (range, 0-30.5). The most common co-occurring gene mutations were TP53 (48.9%), CDKN2A (14.9%), and ERBB2/FGFR1/MUC16/SMAD4 (12.8%).

Notably, among patients with ERBB2 alterations, 50% had amplifications and 2 patients had breast carcinoma. One patient presented with an ALK fusion, and 1 patient had a FGFR1 fusion. In all patients evaluated, 8.5% presented with a KRAS p.G12X mutation, and 10.6% of patients had EGFR alterations, which included 2 patients with L858R mutations and 2 patients with exon 19 deletions.

Additional data showed that 76.6% of the partners were novel, and the most common break points of NRG1 were intron5 and intron1. The most common NRG1 fusion partners were CD74 (10.1%), SLC34A2 (10.1%) and WRN (4.3%). Other known partners included CDH1HMBOX1ADAM5, and UNC5D.

“This study revealed NRG1 fusions in approximately 0.19% of Chinese NSCLC tumor patients and presented the frequency of same common tumors,” the study authors concluded. “…NRG1 fusions are oncogenic in various tumor types and represent an emerging potential therapeutic target.”


Yuan S, Chen H, Wang L, et al. The landscape of NRG1 fusions based on NGS in Chinese solid tumor patients. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 16):e15073. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e15073

Related Videos
Cretostimogene grenadenorepvec’s efficacy compares favorably with the current nonsurgical standards of care in high-risk, Bacillus Calmette Guerin–unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.
Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.
Treatment with tisotumab vedotin may be a standard of care in second- or third-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, says Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
Future analyses will look at durvalumab/olaparib for endometrial cancer populations with TP53 and POLE alterations, as well as those with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity.
Patients with mismatch repair proficient, newly diagnosed, advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer may have enhanced benefit with the addition of olaparib to durvalumab.
Common adverse effects following treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the phase 3 CLEAR study include diarrhea, hypertension, and fatigue, according to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP.
Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab appears to raise no new safety signals in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma after 4 years of follow-up in the phase 3 CLEAR study.
According to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP, 4-year follow-up data from the phase 3 CLEAR study confirm the maintained benefits of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Related Content