Tremelimumab/Durvalumab Demonstrates Safety, Activity in Gastric/GEJ Adenocarcinoma

Article

Pre-operative tremelimumab plus durvalumab elicited encouraging safety and activity in patients with microsatellite instability–high resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

In patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative gastric or gastroesophageal (GEJ) junction cancer, pre-operative tremelimumab (Imjudo) and durvalumab (Imfinzi) combination therapy was safe and produced encouraging clinical activity, according to findings from the phase 2 INFINITY trial (NCT04817826) presented at the 2023 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

In the efficacy evaluable population, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate for patients who were treated with tremelimumab plus durvalumab was 60%, and the rate of major to complete pathological response in those with less than 10% of viable cells was 80%.

With a median follow-up of 13.4 months months, investigators observed progression-free survival events in 2 patients and 4 death events.

With a median follow-up of 13.4 months months, investigators observed progression-free survival events in 2 patients and 4 death events.

“One [patient] had heterogenous proficient and deficient MMR status at surgery, thus highlighting the importance of adequate initial sampling,” presenting author Filippo Pietrantonio, MD, Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, said in the presentation.

With a median follow-up of 13.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 9.7-14.2) months, investigators observed progression-free survival (PFS) events in 2 patients and 4 death events, which were attributed to progressive disease (n = 1), late surgical complications (n =2), and secondary brain tumor (n = 1).

Investigators of the phase 2 INFINITY trial evaluated tremelimumab plus durvalumab combination therapy among patients resectable gastric or GEJ cancer. Patients received 300 mg of tremelimumab for 12 weeks with 1500 mg of durvalumab every 4 weeks for 3 cycles followed by surgery.

The primary end point for cohort 1 was pCR and negative circulating tumor DNA status following neoadjuvant therapy. Key secondary end points included health-related quality of life during neoadjuvant treatment, disease-free survival, OS, safety and surgical morbidity, and exploratory and translational analyses.

From May 2021 to February 2022, 18 patients enrolled and began study treatment. Of these patients, 1 withdrew consent after 1 cycle and 2 refused surgery. Fifteen patients were evaluable for the primary end point, 14 of whom underwent radical surgery and 1 had progressive disease and did not receive radical surgery.

Of the total population, the median patient age was 71.5 years (IQR, 65-80). Additionally, most patients were male (67%), had an ECOG performance status of 0 (67%), and had gastric cancer (78%). Most patients had T3 disease (56%), N2 disease (50%), and no bulky tumors (78%).

In an analysis of exploratory end points, the pCR rate was 17% (n = 1/6) for those with T4 disease and 89% (n = 8/9) for those with stage T2 or T3 tumors (P = 011). Investigators also reported no correlation between pCR and N status. Moreover, PD-1 combined positive score was not associated with outcomes, and tumor mutational burden demonstrated a non-significant trend towards correlation with pCR.

The most common any-grade immune-related adverse effects (AEs) included pruritus (22%), thyroiditis (22%), hepatitis (17%), and skin rash (17%). Investigators observed several events of grade 3 or higher AEs including hepatitis (n = 1), colitis (n = 1), and pneumonitis (n = 1).

“The global quality of life was preserved during the neoadjuvant phase [of treatment],” Petrantonio said regarding findings from the quality-of-life end point.

Reference

Pietrantonio F, Raimondi A, Lonardi S, et al. INFINITY: a multicentre, single-arm, multi-cohort, phase II trial of tremelimumab and durvalumab as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI) resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GAC/GEJAC). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(suppl 4):358. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.3_suppl.358

Related Videos
Considering cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer may help with managing the shortage of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, according to Joshua J. Meeks, MD, PhD, BS.
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and visceral disease may particularly benefit from enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, according to Amanda Nizam, MD.
High-grade adverse effects with zanidatamab plus palbociclib and fulvestrant seem to be uncommon in patients with HER2-positive, hormone receptor–positive, metastatic breast cancer, according to Sara Hurvitz, MD, FACP.
Black male patients with breast cancer appear to experience worse survival outcomes compared with White patients when controlling for clinicopathological variables, according to Jason (Jincong) Q. Freeman, MPH, MS.
Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E4112 trial appear to support the use of DCIS scores for identifying patients with breast cancer who may be eligible to omit radiotherapy following MRI-guided surgery.
Providers should inform patients with breast cancer that selecting later-line therapies following prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a “developing area,” says Abigail M. Johnston, JD.
Data from the phase 3 NATALEE trial highlight a positive toxicity profile for ribociclib as an adjuvant therapy for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, says Neil M. Iyengar, MD.
Future research will focus on ctDNA dynamics change over time in the full translational cohort of patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the phase 3 monarchE study, says Stephanie L. Graff, MD.
Findings from a National Cancer Database analysis highlight no statistically significant differences in survival outcomes with chemotherapy for patients over 81 years old with triple-negative breast cancer compared with those who do not receive chemotherapy.
Related Content