Vikram Narayan, MD, on the Future of Nadofaragene Firadenovec and Bladder Cancer

Video

Narayan discusses what he thinks the future of nadofaragene firadenovec and bladder cancer are at this year’s SUO Meeting.

Vikram Narayan, MD, built off of his research at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society of Urologic Oncology in an interview with CancerNetwork discussing the potential future of nadofaragene firadenovec and the field of bladder cancer.

Transcription:

I think this is a very promising time for patients with bladder cancer, and in particular patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who have failed BCG. When I was a resident in training, I was always struck by how few options we had to offer these patients and fortunately this is something that’s starting to change, and it’s exciting that nadofaragene may be 1 potential option for these patients in the future. There’s still a lot of work that needs to be done, but some of the discussion at SUO was trying to identify ways and sort of develop plans to study biomarkers and other tools to identify which patients will most likely not only do best with certain treatments but potentially even look at combination strategies. And then we’ll also need to study what sequence of treatments, especially as more of these agents become available. What combinations are best and in what order should they potentially be explored for these patients. Those are areas of ongoing research that will need to be delved into.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Related Content