Vikram Narayan, MD, on the Future of Nadofaragene Firadenovec and Bladder Cancer

Video

Narayan discusses what he thinks the future of nadofaragene firadenovec and bladder cancer are at this year’s SUO Meeting.

Vikram Narayan, MD, built off of his research at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society of Urologic Oncology in an interview with CancerNetwork discussing the potential future of nadofaragene firadenovec and the field of bladder cancer.

Transcription:

I think this is a very promising time for patients with bladder cancer, and in particular patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who have failed BCG. When I was a resident in training, I was always struck by how few options we had to offer these patients and fortunately this is something that’s starting to change, and it’s exciting that nadofaragene may be 1 potential option for these patients in the future. There’s still a lot of work that needs to be done, but some of the discussion at SUO was trying to identify ways and sort of develop plans to study biomarkers and other tools to identify which patients will most likely not only do best with certain treatments but potentially even look at combination strategies. And then we’ll also need to study what sequence of treatments, especially as more of these agents become available. What combinations are best and in what order should they potentially be explored for these patients. Those are areas of ongoing research that will need to be delved into.

Recent Videos
The addition of radiotherapy to CAR T-cell therapy may particularly benefit patients with localized disease, according to Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD.
Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD, discusses how radiation may play a role as bridging therapy to CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
James Ninia, MD, discussed treatment options for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer undergoing metastasis-directed radiotherapy.
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Related Content