Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, Reviews MSI as a Biomarker in for Localized Gastric Cancer

Video

Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, spoke about which biomarkers were most predictive for treatment of localized gastric cancer.

At the 2022 International Gastric Cancer Conference, Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, chief of Gastrointestinal Oncology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, spoke with CancerNetwork® about microsatellite instability (MSI) as a biomarker for patients with localized gastric cancer and how it may be effective when deciding on treatment options.

Transcript:

For localized therapy, the most important biomarker that we could check—and it’s critical, even though that’s a rare biomarker—is microsatellite instability, or the MSI-high population. We know that these patients tend to do very well perhaps with surgery alone or even potentially with immunotherapy and then surgery. We also know, definitively, that immunotherapy is important in those patients with stage IV disease. Whether it will have a definitive foothold in the perioperative setting is still to be determined. What we also know is that those patients’ tumors tend to be chemotherapy resistant. You may harm your patient, as a surgeon, if you don’t know what their MSI status is, and then refer them to preoperative therapy. Data from the MAGIC study shows that peri-operative [epirubicin-based] therapy harms those patients. There are plenty of data to suggest that immunotherapy helps, but chemotherapy probably harms or is neutral. There’s a suggestion that chemotherapy in adjuvant setting may be neutral, but in the preoperative setting it’s harmful.

Reference

Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11-20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa055531

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Related Content