84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 81

84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background/Significance

Vagina/sexual health issues are common but under-recognized and understudied in women with breast cancer being treated with endocrine therapy. The EQUALS (ELAINE ESR1 QUAlity of Life Survey) explored quality of life and symptoms, biomarkers, treatment adverse effects (AEs), and patient-medical team communication of women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Here, the vagina/sexual health aspects from 3 EQUALS were summarized.

Materials and Methods

EQUALS 1, 2, and 3 (EQ1, EQ2, EQ3) were sent to/posted for ER–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients from Cure Media Group, Facebook and Twitter groups, patient advocacy groups, authors’ contacts, and breast cancer clinic patients in June 2022 (EQ1, 42 questions), March/April 2023 (EQ2; 50 questions; mostly on vulvovaginal atrophy), and June/September 2023 (EQ3, 55 questions). Survey answers were summarized descriptively. Patients received a $10 gift card at survey completion.

Results

887 patients completed 3 EQUALS. Respondents were 19 to 83 years old; and one-third to one-half were non-White in EQ1/3, and mostly White (85%) in EQ2. Half to three quarters lived in urban/suburban settings; three-quarters had higher education. Patients had 1 to 4 treatment lines for metastatic breast cancer.

Vaginal symptoms were reported by 61% of patients and associated with breast cancer treatment for a mean of 4.8 years (EQ2). The most bothersome symptoms were vaginal dryness (33%), painful intercourse (14%), and vaginal itching (10%). AEs impacting quality of life were vaginal atrophy/dryness (36% to 47%) in EQ1/3, and sexual dysfunction (45%) in EQ3.

Sexual intimacy worried 64% of patients in EQ1; vaginal/sexual AEs concerned 80% in EQ2; and sexual dysfunction concerned 27% in EQ3. More than half (60%) of patients said metastatic breast cancer or its treatment negatively impacted intimate/sexual relationships in EQ1. In EQ2, vaginal/sexual AEs negatively impacted sexual intercourse frequency (61%) and self-esteem (64%), and made 51% feel isolated. Commonly reported effects of vaginal/sexual AEs were limited enjoyment of sexual activity (39%), painful intercourse (33%), and vaginal burning/itching (32%). Half (54%) of patients never/almost never felt sexual desire/interest in the past month, especially when prior endocrine therapy negatively impacted their sexual health (61%); low sexual desire bothered 56%.

In EQ1/2, 31% to 61% of patients were uncomfortable discussing vaginal/sexual AEs with their medical team. In EQ2, approximately one-third felt poorly informed by their medical team (38%) and poorly equipped to improve these AEs (33%). More patients in EQ1/2 were comfortable discussing these AEs, and in EQ2, more felt well informed by their medical team, if their oncologist was female.

Most (93%, EQ2) were interested in an FDA-approved, well-tolerated, breast cancer treatment that improved vaginal/sexual health.

Conclusion

Women treated for ER–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer experienced and were concerned about vaginal/sexual AEs, which negatively impacted their intimate/sexual relationships. Many were uncomfortable discussing these symptoms with their medical team and felt poorly informed/equipped to manage them.

Articles in this issue

84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
86 Elacestrant Combinations in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update From ELEVATE, a Phase 1b/2, Open-Label, Umbrella Study
86 Elacestrant Combinations in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update From ELEVATE, a Phase 1b/2, Open-Label, Umbrella Study
87 Elacestrant Plus Abemaciclib Combination in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-positive, HER2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
87 Elacestrant Plus Abemaciclib Combination in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-positive, HER2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
88 Eflapegrastim, a Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor, Administered the Same Day as Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Results From a Multicenter, Open-Label Study
88 Eflapegrastim, a Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor, Administered the Same Day as Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Results From a Multicenter, Open-Label Study
TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Related Content