91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 68

91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer

91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer

Background/Significance

There is no definite recommendation regarding post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in patients with T3N0M0, luminal breast cancer. We have previously shown that in patients with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-negative tumors and low recurrence prediction scores experience a comparable rate of recurrence irrespective of PMRT. Radiation therapy adds morbidity including dermatitis/fibrosis, breast/chest wall pain, impaired mobility, breast/arm edema, and cardiac adverse effects (AEs). Our goal is to investigate the AEs of radiation therapy and to use Medicare reimbursement data to assess the financial burden of radiation therapy in this patient population.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of all female patients at our institution with T3N0M0, HR–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who underwent mastectomy between 2012 and 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the administration of PMRT, and early and late AEs of PMRT were recorded. We then analyzed the cost of radiation therapy based on Medicare reimbursement data. The additional cost of treating radiation therapy-related AEs was not included.

Results

Of the 84 patients who met the study criteria, 56% (n = 47) underwent PMRT, and 44% (n = 37) did not. The mean age was 60.9 years (± 13.0), and the median follow-up was 82 months (range, 4-152). There was no statistical difference in age, mean estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptors (PR) H-score, or T stage between the PMRT and no-radiation therapy groups. In the PMRT group, 27% (n = 10) of patients had immediate breast reconstruction.

There was no significant difference in local recurrence rates (2.1% and 5.4% in the PMRT and no-PMRT groups, respectively; P = .42), or distant recurrence rates (8.5% and 4.3% in the PMRT and no-PMRT groups, respectively; P = .58). Radiation therapy-related local complication was seen in 26 patients; minor skin toxicity (hyperpigmentation, telangiectasia, skin thickening, n = 20), major skin toxicity (n = 2), dehiscence/necrosis (n = 1), Lichen sclerosus (n = 1), angiosarcoma (n = 1), implant capsular contraction (n = 1), and cardiac events were seen in 29 patients (events related with coronary artery disease, stroke, arrhythmia). In this cohort, radiation therapy would cost Medicare an additional $656,619 ($13,970 per patient).

Conclusion

In the T3N0M0, HR–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer group, radiation therapy did not reduce the recurrence rate of breast cancer, but it significantly increased morbidity and costs. Consistent with the SUPREMO trial result, omitting radiation could reduce patient AEs and financial stress in this patient population.

Articles in this issue

55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Clinical trials conducted in recent years demonstrate the benefit of integrative oncology for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Related Content