TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 19-20

TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study

TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study

Background

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard of care (SOC) for treating estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/HER2-negative (HER2–) early breast cancer (EBC). Despite advances to optimize adj treatment in high-risk ER+/HER2- EBC, there continues to be a risk of local and metastatic (incurable) recurrence that persists, and new therapies with desirable safety profiles are warranted. Elacestrant is a next-generation oral SERD that provides a novel mechanism of action that has shown both SERD (degradative) and SERM (partial agonist) activity that differs from currently available adjuvant ET. In the EMERALD trial, elacestrant significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs SOC ET in the overall population (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; P = .0018) and in patients with ESR1-mutated tumors (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P = .0005). In patients with ESR1-mutated tumors who received prior ET plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4.6i) at 12 months or longer, median PFS with elacestrant was 8.6 months vs 1.9 months with SOC ET. In a preoperative, window of opportunity ER+/HER2– EBC trial (SOLTI-1905-ELIPSE), elacestrant was associated with complete cell cycle arrest (defined as Ki67 < 2.7%) rate of 27% and a statistically significant mean change from baseline, shifting tumor biology toward a more endocrine-sensitive and less proliferative tumor phenotype. Given that elacestrant demonstrated efficacy in metastatic breast cancer regardless of ESR1-mutation status relative to SOC ET and has shown biologic activity in EBC, it is hypothesized that elacestrant can prolong invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) in patients with high-risk EBC who received prior adjuvant ET with or without CDK4/6i.

Materials and Methods

ELEGANT (NCT06492616) is a global, multicenter, open-label phase 3 study designed to evaluate elacestrant vs SOC ET (aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen) in patients with EBC and a high risk of recurrence. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to continue SOC ET or to elacestrant for a duration of 5 years. Eligible patients are women or men with ER+/HER2− node-positive EBC who have completed 24 to 60 months of adjuvant ET with or without CDK4/6i, and an ECOG performance status of≤1. Patients who received a prior CDK4/6i or a PARP inhibitor must have already completed or discontinued these treatments. Pre/perimenopausal women and men will be administered a LHRH agonist. Exclusion criteria include inflammatory breast cancer, history of prior invasive breast cancer, and > 6 month continuous interruption of prior SOC adjuvant ET or discontinuation of adjuvant ET > 6 months prior to randomization. The primary end point is IBCFS. Key secondary end points include distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, invasive disease-free survival, safety, patient-reported outcomes-quality of life, and pharmacokinetics.

Status

Planned enrollment is 4220 patients; recruitment is ongoing.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.