TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 19-20

TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study

TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study

Background

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard of care (SOC) for treating estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/HER2-negative (HER2–) early breast cancer (EBC). Despite advances to optimize adj treatment in high-risk ER+/HER2- EBC, there continues to be a risk of local and metastatic (incurable) recurrence that persists, and new therapies with desirable safety profiles are warranted. Elacestrant is a next-generation oral SERD that provides a novel mechanism of action that has shown both SERD (degradative) and SERM (partial agonist) activity that differs from currently available adjuvant ET. In the EMERALD trial, elacestrant significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs SOC ET in the overall population (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; P = .0018) and in patients with ESR1-mutated tumors (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P = .0005). In patients with ESR1-mutated tumors who received prior ET plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4.6i) at 12 months or longer, median PFS with elacestrant was 8.6 months vs 1.9 months with SOC ET. In a preoperative, window of opportunity ER+/HER2– EBC trial (SOLTI-1905-ELIPSE), elacestrant was associated with complete cell cycle arrest (defined as Ki67 < 2.7%) rate of 27% and a statistically significant mean change from baseline, shifting tumor biology toward a more endocrine-sensitive and less proliferative tumor phenotype. Given that elacestrant demonstrated efficacy in metastatic breast cancer regardless of ESR1-mutation status relative to SOC ET and has shown biologic activity in EBC, it is hypothesized that elacestrant can prolong invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) in patients with high-risk EBC who received prior adjuvant ET with or without CDK4/6i.

Materials and Methods

ELEGANT (NCT06492616) is a global, multicenter, open-label phase 3 study designed to evaluate elacestrant vs SOC ET (aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen) in patients with EBC and a high risk of recurrence. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to continue SOC ET or to elacestrant for a duration of 5 years. Eligible patients are women or men with ER+/HER2− node-positive EBC who have completed 24 to 60 months of adjuvant ET with or without CDK4/6i, and an ECOG performance status of≤1. Patients who received a prior CDK4/6i or a PARP inhibitor must have already completed or discontinued these treatments. Pre/perimenopausal women and men will be administered a LHRH agonist. Exclusion criteria include inflammatory breast cancer, history of prior invasive breast cancer, and > 6 month continuous interruption of prior SOC adjuvant ET or discontinuation of adjuvant ET > 6 months prior to randomization. The primary end point is IBCFS. Key secondary end points include distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, invasive disease-free survival, safety, patient-reported outcomes-quality of life, and pharmacokinetics.

Status

Planned enrollment is 4220 patients; recruitment is ongoing.

Articles in this issue

12 Gut Microbiome Composition and Pathological Complete Response After Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Insights From a Pilot Study
12 Gut Microbiome Composition and Pathological Complete Response After Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Insights From a Pilot Study
13 Preliminary Analysis of Change During Treatment of Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients
13 Preliminary Analysis of Change During Treatment of Financial Toxicity and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients
15 Utilizing Circulating Tumor Cells to Guide HER2-Directed Therapy in IHC/FISH-Negative HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
15 Utilizing Circulating Tumor Cells to Guide HER2-Directed Therapy in IHC/FISH-Negative HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
16 A Miami Hospital’s Infrastructure to Help Decrease Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Improve Health Equity
16 A Miami Hospital’s Infrastructure to Help Decrease Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Improve Health Equity
17 Salmonella and the Breast: A Literature Review of Salmonella-Induced Breast Abscesses
17 Salmonella and the Breast: A Literature Review of Salmonella-Induced Breast Abscesses
18 Tolerability of First-Line Treatment With Ribociclib for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using 2 Large US Data Sources
18 Tolerability of First-Line Treatment With Ribociclib for Metastatic Breast Cancer Using 2 Large US Data Sources
20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast
20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast
21 Distant Disease-Free Survival Across Key Subgroups From the Phase 3 NATALEE Trial of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer
21 Distant Disease-Free Survival Across Key Subgroups From the Phase 3 NATALEE Trial of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer
22 Efficacy and Safety of Ribociclib + Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Younger Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in NATALEE
22 Efficacy and Safety of Ribociclib + Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Younger Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in NATALEE
23 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer By Prior Systemic Treatment: A Subgroup Analysis of the NATALEE Trial
23 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer By Prior Systemic Treatment: A Subgroup Analysis of the NATALEE Trial
TPS 24 Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB + Ribociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer With GRPR Expression With Early Relapse FromAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Progression on ET + CDK4/6i for ABC
TPS 24 Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB + Ribociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer With GRPR Expression With Early Relapse FromAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Progression on ET + CDK4/6i for ABC
TPS 25 Phase 1/2 Study of the Novel Radioligand Therapy [177Lu]Lu-NeoB Plus Capecitabine in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) With GRPR Expression After Progression on Prior Endocrine Therapy Plus a CDK4/6 Inhibitor for ABC
TPS 25 Phase 1/2 Study of the Novel Radioligand Therapy [177Lu]Lu-NeoB Plus Capecitabine in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) With GRPR Expression After Progression on Prior Endocrine Therapy Plus a CDK4/6 Inhibitor for ABC
26 Risk of Recurrence in Real-World NATALEE- and monarchE-Eligible Populations of Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in an Electronic Health Record-Derived Database
26 Risk of Recurrence in Real-World NATALEE- and monarchE-Eligible Populations of Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in an Electronic Health Record-Derived Database
27 Elacestrant vs Standard of Care in ER+, HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer With ESR1-Mutated Tumors: ESR1 Allelic Frequencies and Clinical Activity From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
27 Elacestrant vs Standard of Care in ER+, HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer With ESR1-Mutated Tumors: ESR1 Allelic Frequencies and Clinical Activity From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study
TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Breast oncologist Jade E. Jones, MD, says she tries to send patients with BRCA-mutant HR-positive TNBC to clinical trials that use PARP inhibitors.
Following progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor, ascertaining the endocrine sensitivity of HR-positive/HER2-negative disease may inform sequential treatment.
T-DXd improved progression-free survival over standard chemotherapy among patients with HR-positive/triple-negative breast cancer in DESTINY-Breast04.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Related Content