Adil Daud, MD, on the Importance of Testing Patients with Melanoma for BRAF Mutations

Video

Adil Daud, MD, spoke about the emergence of next-generation sequencing and the importance of testing patients with melanoma for BRAF mutations.

Adil Daud, MD, of the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center discussed with CancerNetwork the use of next-generation sequencing to not only spot common BRAF mutations but find rarer mutations in patients with melanoma.

Transcription:

It’s an extremely important subject, and in the past people would use the specific BRAF test and that’s what we did too. But I’d say in the last 2-3 years, most centers in the US have switched to using next-generation sequencing, which has the advantage that you can see the BRAF mutation but you can also see some of the uncommon BRAF mutations like V600K, V600D which it’s about 10% of all BRAF mutations are non-V600E which is the one that’s detected by the BRAF test. But then also you can recognize things like NRAS mutations C-KIT mutations and some of the fusions like the ROS1 fusion, ALK fusion that are rare, but are seen sometimes especially in younger people with melanoma or in melanoma that arises in the achiral extremities, those types of melanomas. Also, for uveal melanoma, next gen sequencing can spot GNAQ, GNA11 mutations, BAP1 loss, which straight forward V600E tests won’t do.

I think the downside of NGS is that it takes 2-3 weeks to get the results back and sometimes you really need to get somebody started as soon as possible. I think it’s reasonable in my opinion to start with immunotherapy, given what we’ve just discussed, while you’re waiting for your NGS results and then when you get your NGS results you could decide whether it makes sense to do target therapy or not.

Recent Videos
James Ninia, MD, discussed treatment options for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer undergoing metastasis-directed radiotherapy.
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Related Content