Anticonvulsants Can Alter Irinotecan Metabolism

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 10 No 9
Volume 10
Issue 9

SAN ANTONIO-Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) can significantly alter the metabolism of irinotecan (Camptosar) and should be taken into consideration when treating patients for brain tumors, according to John G. Kuhn, PharmD. Dr. Kuhn is professor of Pharmacology and Medicine at the University of Texas Health Sciences Center in San Antonio, Texas. He discussed data on irinotecan pharmacokinetics from an ongoing North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC) phase I study.

SAN ANTONIO—Enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) can significantly alter the metabolism of irinotecan (Camptosar) and should be taken into consideration when treating patients for brain tumors, according to John G. Kuhn, PharmD. Dr. Kuhn is professor of Pharmacology and Medicine at the University of Texas Health Sciences Center in San Antonio, Texas. He discussed data on irinotecan pharmacokinetics from an ongoing North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC) phase I study.

Irinotecan is metabolized via CYP3A4 to less active oxidative metabolites and bioactivated in the liver and intestine by carboxylesterases to the active SN-38 metabolite. Dr. Kuhn said the NABTC study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan given every 3 weeks to patients who were taking EIAEDs and to patients who were not taking such drugs. A phase II study will determine efficacy in progressive or recurrent primary gliomas.

Inducing and Noninducing Drugs Are Tested

The EIAEDs include phenytoin (Dilantin), phenobarbital (Donnatal), and carbamazepine (Tegretol). The noninducing AEDs include gabapentin (Neurontin), valproic acid (Depakene), levetiracetam (Keppra), topiramate (Topamax), lamotrigine (Lamictal), zonisamide (Zonegran), and tiagabine (Gabitril). Patients not on EIAEDs (n = 34, 22 evaluable) were treated with irinotecan 350 mg/m² IV over 90 minutes with no dose escalations. Patients on EIAEDs (n = 48, 34 evaluable) were treated with irinotecan at 350 mg/m² with dose escalations in 50 mg/m² increments.

"In the EIAEDs group, the dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 diarrhea at the 800 mg/m² dose level. The phase II dose will be 750 mg/m² every 3 weeks. Clearance of irinotecan was about twofold higher in patients taking these drugs, and there was a dramatic decrease in the level of the active metabolite SN-38," Dr. Kuhn said. "Non-EIAEDs with or without steroids had little effect on irinotecan metabolism and excretion. Gabapentin, although not an enzyme-inducing agent, had a greater than expected effect on irinotecan clearance."

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Specialties including neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and neuro-rehabilitation all play a notable role in the care of patients with brain tumors.
Treatment-related toxicities during neuro-oncology therapy appear well managed with dose modifications and treatment cycle holds.
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
CAR T-cell therapies appear to be an evolving modality in the treatment of those with intracranial tumors, said Sylvia Kurz, MD, PhD.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
CancerNetwork® spoke with Neha Mehta-Shah, MD, MSCI, about the clinical landscape for patients undergoing treatment for rare lymphomas.
Related Content