Can Patients With HIV and a Cancer Diagnosis Safely Receive Immunotherapy?

Article

Researchers tested whether immunotherapy could be safely used in HIV-positive patients with cancer.

Treating cancer patients who are HIV-positive with immunotherapy agents is safe and feasible, according to a new study. CD4 lymphocyte count and HIV viral load should be monitored during treatment, but anti–programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors should not be ruled out because of HIV positivity.

“[Patients with HIV] are at higher risk for a number of cancers: AIDS-defining forms, the diagnosis of which results in the categorization of a person as suffering from AIDS, but also various other types that they are two to three times more likely to develop than in the general population, such as anal, skin, head and neck, and lung cancer,” said Aurélien Gobert, MD, of Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière in Paris, according to a press release. HIV-positive patients are generally excluded from clinical trials, given the assumption that they are at higher risk of developing complications, so immunotherapy’s efficacy and safety in this population was unknown.

The researchers evaluated immunotherapy in 20 HIV-positive patients; one had metastatic melanoma, while the other 19 had metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. The results were presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2018 Congress, held October 19–23 in Munich.

At the time of diagnosis, the median lymphocyte count in the cohort was 338.5/mm3. The viral load was undetectable in 17 patients, and it was low in 2 cases and unknown in 1 patient. The patients were followed for a median of 11 months, and all patients were treated with nivolumab for a median of 6 infusions.

There were no toxic deaths reported, and no immune-related adverse events. One patient had a rising HIV viral load and decreasing CD4 lymphocyte count, indicating that the virus was reactivated. However, this occurred after an interruption to antiretroviral therapy.

Response to nivolumab was assessable in 17 of the patients. Among those patients, there were 4 partial responses (24%), 2 patients had stable disease (12%), and the remaining 11 patients had progressive disease (64%). Gobert stressed that the size of this cohort and the length of follow-up does not allow firm conclusions on efficacy.

“Our key insight then, is that the treatment appears to be well tolerated by HIV-positive cancer patients-so long as antiretroviral therapy is continued in parallel,” Gobert said.

John Haanen, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, commented on the study, and he noted that in spite of its small size it is among the largest so far conducted on HIV patients treated with immunotherapy. “The results confirm those of other, smaller cohorts in showing that while on antiretroviral therapy, cancer patients living with HIV can safely receive anti–PD-1 treatment,” he said. “The efficacy data also suggest that the overall response rate of HIV-positive patients seems to be similar to that of other cancer patients. These promising results need to be confirmed in larger studies-ideally, in a prospective clinical trial.”

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
The annual Kidney Cancer Research Summit was born from congressional funding for kidney cancer research, according to KidneyCAN president Bryan Lewis.
Combining renal vaccines with immune therapy may better target tumor cells while limiting harm to healthy tissue, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
Improving data collection and biomarker development across institutions may represent areas of expansion in kidney cancer research.
Related Content