Commentary on Abstract #527

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 8
Volume 14
Issue 8

Ever since the first phase II study of paclitaxel (Taxol) began, there has been ongoing controversy about the optimal dose and schedule of administration of this drug. The initial reports of marked antitumor activity against metastatic breast cancer were obtained using 250 mg/m² administered by 24-hour continuous IV infusion. This schedule was originally developed in an attempt to reduce the incidence and severity of anaphylactic reactions. Subsequent to the determination that this dose and schedule was effective and safe, there were multiple attempts to develop more convenient schedules, and dose/schedules associated with an improved side-effect profile.

Ever since the first phase II study of paclitaxel (Taxol) began, there has been ongoing controversy about the optimal dose and schedule of administration of this drug. The initial reports of marked antitumor activity against metastatic breast cancer were obtained using 250 mg/m² administered by 24-hour continuous IV infusion. This schedule was originally developed in an attempt to reduce the incidence and severity of anaphylactic reactions. Subsequent to the determination that this dose and schedule was effective and safe, there were multiple attempts to develop more convenient schedules, and dose/schedules associated with an improved side-effect profile.

In 1994, several investigators started to explore weekly schedules of administration of paclitaxel, to increase dose intensity. The early reports suggested a surprising modification of the safety profile of paclitaxel using this schedule, with maintenance of substantial antitumor activity.

Breier et al (Br Cancer Res Treat 57[1]:124, 1999) were able to maintain a very high dose intensity with the weekly schedule over substantial time periods; second, severe myelosuppression was virtually absent, and therefore, no febrile neutropenia was reported; third, steroid premedication was successfully tapered and discontinued in many patients without hypersensitivity reactions. Finally, in a group of patients with previous exposure to anthracyclines, they observed a 53% objective response rate.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) shows marked antitumor activity against breast cancer. Although its activity is less schedule dependent, the impressive change in the safety profile of paclitaxel associated with the weekly schedule prompted the evaluation of docetaxel given weekly. As described in the abstract by Loeffler et al (abstract #527), similar changes in the toxicity profile of docetaxel were observed: myelosuppression decreased dramatically, as did the frequency and severity of infectious (febrile) complications. Furthermore, this was accomplished without apparent loss of therapeutic activity.

Both paclitaxel and docetaxel are currently under formal evaluation in multiple prospective randomized trials, comparing weekly and every-3-weekly schedules of administration. In some, the agents are used alone, while in others, combinations with other agents are being tested. The results of these trials will define the optimal schedule of administration for both taxanes.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.