Comparable Survival Rates Observed in Chemotherapy Regimen With Watchful Waiting and Sequential Conditioning Prior to alloHCT in R/R AML


The phase 3 ASAP trial found the use of watchful waiting followed by sequential conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation found a similar survival benefit in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

The phase 3 ASAP trial (NCT02461537) found watchful waiting and sequential conditioning prior to an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) had comparable overall survival (OS) results and leukemia-free survival for those who received induction chemotherapy which included high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone followed by alloHCT in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), based on results from a presentation at the 2022 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting.

The findings, which were presented during a press briefing at the 2022 ASH Annual Meeting, showed that the primary end point of disease-free survival (DFS) at day 56 was reached by 84.1% of those in the disease control (DISC) arm (n = 139) and 81.3% of those in the remission induction strategy (RIST) arm (n = 137; test for noninferiority, P = .047).

Although this missed statistical significance against the 1-sided α of 2.5%, the probability that the true success rate in the investigative arm is below the noninferiority margin is only 4.7%, said study author Johannes Schetelig, MD, MSc, of the University Hospital TU Dresden, Germany, in a presentation of the data.

Schetelig added that the authors acknowledge that DFS at day 56 is not an accepted surrogate end point following transplantation. At a median follow-up of 37 months, no difference in leukemia-free survival from day 56 (P = .061) or OS from randomization (P = .047) was observed between DISC and RIST.

“Our conclusions are that patients with poor response after first induction chemotherapy or first relapse of AML do not benefit from salvage chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine plus an anthracycline prior to transplantation,” Schetelig said. “Watchful waiting and sequential conditioning prior to allogeneic transplantation results in comparable [complete response] CR rates and OS and may be the preferred option whenever a stem cell donor is readily available.”

In patients with AML, CR before alloHCT is known to be a favorable risk factor. Intensive chemotherapy can be given prior to alloHCT to try to induce CR, but it is unknown whether those with relapsed or refractory disease derive benefit from this approach. Sequential conditioning with high-dose cytarabine or melphalan followed by reduced intensity conditioning and alloHCT has resulted in long-term disease control for this population.

“Our hypothesis was that salvage chemotherapy would not provide a net benefit for patients with high-risk AML,” Schetelig said.

To test this hypothesis, investigators enrolled adult patients with nonfavorable-risk AML following first induction therapy or first untreated relapse who were fit for intensive chemotherapy and alloHCT. Patients were required to have a matched sibling donor, a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-compatible unrelated donor, or an ongoing donor search with 2 potential unrelated donors and an HLA-matching probability of at least 90%.

Study participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the RIST arm or the DISC arm. Those in the RIST arm received salvage chemotherapy with cytarabine at 3 g/m2 (1 g/m2 for those older than 60 years) twice daily on days 1 to 3 plus mitoxantrone at 10 mg/m2 on days 3 to 5 followed by alloHCT. In the DISC arm, watchful waiting was recommended, but low-dose cytarabine and single doses of mitoxantrone were allowed for disease control; this was followed by sequential conditioning and alloHCT.

The primary end point of the trial was treatment success, which was defined as DFS at day 65 following alloHCT. Investigators sought to demonstrate noninferiority for the DISC arm, with a margin of 5% and a 1-sided α of 2.5%. OS from randomization and leukemia-free survival from day 65 served as key secondary end points.

The median age in the DISC and RIST arms was 61 years; less than half of patients were female (45% vs 42%, respectively) and most patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (88% vs 90%). “Patients had active disease—two-thirds defined by poor induction response and one-third defined by relapsed AML,” Schetelig noted.

In the DISC arm, the median time to transplantation was 4 weeks, and of note, 76% of patients were cared for by watchful waiting only during that period. Sixteen weeks from randomization, 97% of the intention-to-treat population had undergone transplantation.

In the RIST arm, Schetelig noted that every second patient achieved a CR with salvage chemotherapy. Here, the median time to transplantation was 8 weeks. “I would like to highlight that most patients who had not achieved a CR still proceeded to transplantation—72% after sequential conditioning,” he said. In this arm, 93% of patients were transplanted by week 17 from randomization.

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse effects (AEs) was lower in the DISC arm vs the RIST arm, at 23% and 64%, respectively (P < .001). Notably, those in the DISC arm also spent less time in the hospital prior to transplantation vs those in the RIST arm, at a mean of 19 days (range, 7-63) vs 42 days (range, 9-75; P < .001). The day 28 mortality rates from time of randomization in the DISC and RIST arms were 3.6% vs 1.5%, respectively.

In the DISC arm, 4 patients did not undergo transplant because of death due to sepsis (n = 2), leukemia (n = 1), or they decided against alloHCT (n = 1). In the RIST arm, 6 patients did not go on to HCT; 3 patients did not do so because they died from pneumonia, 1 due to ICB, 1 because of refractory AML, and 1 decided against it.

Time to discharge and in-hospital mortality did not differ between the 2 arms, Schetelig added.

“A more general conclusion and forward-looking statement is that the benefit of any treatment [aimed] at better results after allogeneic transplantation by inducing a CR prior to transplantation should be demonstrated in prospective clinical trials,” Schetelig said.


Stelljes M, Middeke JM, Bug G, et al. In patients with relapsed/refractory AML sequential conditioning and immediate allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) results in similar overall and leukemia-free survival compared to intensive remission induction chemotherapy followed by allo-HCT: results from the randomized phase III ASAP trial. Blood. 2022;140(suppl 1):9-11. doi:10.1182/blood-2022-159962

Related Videos
Considering cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer may help with managing the shortage of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, according to Joshua J. Meeks, MD, PhD, BS.
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and visceral disease may particularly benefit from enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, according to Amanda Nizam, MD.
High-grade adverse effects with zanidatamab plus palbociclib and fulvestrant seem to be uncommon in patients with HER2-positive, hormone receptor–positive, metastatic breast cancer, according to Sara Hurvitz, MD, FACP.
Black male patients with breast cancer appear to experience worse survival outcomes compared with White patients when controlling for clinicopathological variables, according to Jason (Jincong) Q. Freeman, MPH, MS.
Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E4112 trial appear to support the use of DCIS scores for identifying patients with breast cancer who may be eligible to omit radiotherapy following MRI-guided surgery.
Providers should inform patients with breast cancer that selecting later-line therapies following prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a “developing area,” says Abigail M. Johnston, JD.
Data from the phase 3 NATALEE trial highlight a positive toxicity profile for ribociclib as an adjuvant therapy for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, says Neil M. Iyengar, MD.
Future research will focus on ctDNA dynamics change over time in the full translational cohort of patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the phase 3 monarchE study, says Stephanie L. Graff, MD.
Findings from a National Cancer Database analysis highlight no statistically significant differences in survival outcomes with chemotherapy for patients over 81 years old with triple-negative breast cancer compared with those who do not receive chemotherapy.
Related Content