Expert Highlights Need for Bias Training to Reduce Opioid Access Disparities in Cancer

Video

An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute describes several key strategies for mitigating racial disparities in opioid access among patients with cancer near end of life.

It is important to seek out training opportunities and check unconscious biases through the help of training to help reduce the racial inequities surrounding opioid access for patients with cancer near the end of life, according to Andrea C. Enzinger, MD.

In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, additional research will be required to fully grasp causes and repercussions for disparities in opioid access at end of life, including examining other populations. A multilevel examination may work to determine what is driving the inequities and lead the way for future strategies.

Enzinger, an assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and medical oncologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, spoke with CancerNetwork® discussed how clinics can work towards mitigating these disparities by allocating money and resources towards provide training and instilling compassion across the cancer care continuum.

Transcript:

I hope [what] my colleagues take away from this conversation is an added awareness of the disparities and inequities that our patients face when they are near the end of life. We all come into the field of oncology wanting to make a difference [and] provide high-quality and equitable care. We all can have our own unconscious biases and it’s on us to check those [biases], to seek out training opportunities, and to really think with compassion and with a clear head when we’re looking at a patient in front of us.

We can all be changemakers in our own spheres and own clinics [by considering] the barriers that our patients face and trying to get the supportive care medications and the help that they need to have a good quality of life at the end of their life. [Oncology care teams] can be part of the solution in thinking about where to put resources and dollars in their own clinic to try to mitigate this problem.

Reference

Enzinger AC, Ghosh K, Keating NL, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in opioid access and urine drug screening among older patients with poor-prognosis cancer near the end of life. J Clin Oncol. Published online January 10, 2023. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.01413

Recent Videos
Experts from Vanderbilt University Medical Center emphasize gathering a second opinion to determine if a tumor is resectable in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Experts from Vanderbilt University Medical Center discuss the use of intraoperative radiation therapy in a 64-year-old patient with pancreatic cancer.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Investigators are assessing the use of IORT in patients with borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer as part of the phase 2 PACER trial.
The approval for epcoritamab in patients with R/R follicular lymphoma was supported by encouraging efficacy findings from the phase 1/2 EPCORE NHL-1 trial.
A phase 1/2 trial assessed the use of menin inhibitor DSP-5336 in patients with acute leukemia overexpressing HOXA9 and MEIS1.
A phase 1 trial assessed the use of PSCA-directed CAR T cells in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
A pooled analysis trial assessed the impact of acalabrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia across treatment lines.
Related Content