Front-Line Combo for Multiple Myeloma Shows Survival Benefit

Article

The combination of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone demonstrated an improvement in both response rate and survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not eligible for a stem cell transplant, according to data presented at the 2013 ASH meeting.

Ball-and-stick models of lenalidomide (top) and dexamethasone (bottom)

The combination of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone demonstrated an improvement in both response rate and survival over the current standard of care in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not eligible for a stem cell transplant-the combination of melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT).

The progression-free survival (PFS) was 25.5 months in the lenalidomide plus dexamethasone arm compared with 21.2 months in the MPT treatment arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72; P = .00006).

The initial results from the international phase III FIRST (Frontline Investigation of Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone vs Standard Thalidomide) trial were presented at the plenary session of the 2013 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition held in New Orleans.

“The FIRST trial establishes continuous lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as a new standard of care,” said presenter Thierry Facon, MD, of the Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHRU Lille, France.

“The results of the trial are significant for patients treated in North America,” said Joseph R. Mikhael, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, moderator at a press conference, where the data was presented.

The FIRST trial randomized 1,623 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma equally to one of three treatment arms: lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone given continuously; the same combination given for 18 cycles over 18 months; or to the current standard of care, MPT. Patients were either at least 65 years old or were not candidates for a stem cell transplant. Patients were followed up for 37 months. The international trial enrolled patients from 18 countries in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia and New Zealand. The median age of patients in the trial was 73. The study is the largest randomized study in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, according to Facon.

The traditional fixed duration MPT regimen has a median PFS of about 20.3 months based on prior data.

The difference in PFS between the continuous dosing lenalidomide treatment arm compared with the fixed duration lenalidomide arm was significant: The median PFS of the fixed duration lenalidomide treatment arm was 20.7 months (HR = 0.7; P = .00001).

At 3 years, the PFS rate was 42% in the continuous dosing lenalidomide arm compared with 23% in both the fixed duration lenalidomide and MPT treatment arms.

The 4-year overall survival rate was 59.4% in the continuous dosing lenalidomide arm compared with 51.4% in the MPT arm (HR = 0.78; P = .0168). The 4-year overall survival rate was 55.7% in the fixed duration lenalidomide arm. The difference between the overall survival of the two lenalidomide treatment arms was not statistically significant.

The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was similar for all three treatment arms-11%, 13%, and 14% for the continuous dosing lenalidomide, fixed duration lenalidomide, and MPT regimens, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and neuropathy were lower in the continuous dosing lenalidomide arm compared with the MPT arm (28% vs 45%, 8% vs 11%, 1% vs 3%, and 5% vs 15%, respectively). Infections and deep-vein thrombosis were slightly higher in the continuous dosing lenalidomide arm.

Second primary malignancies (SPM) were lower in the continuous dosing lenalidomide arm. A total of 12 patients had hematologic SPM in the MPT arm compared with 2 patients in each of the lenalidomide arms. The low incidence was not surprising, said Facon.

Lenalidomide is marketed as Revlimid by New Jersey-based Celgene and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in multiple myeloma patients after one prior therapy.

Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content