Frontline Treatment Options in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Show Promise

News
Video

“We need some longer-term overall survival data to help discuss with patients the best treatment of choice for them,” Christine Bestvina, MD, said.

Christine Bestvina, MD, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Chicago, spoke with CancerNetwork® about how she believes that there have been a lot of positive, exciting advancements in frontline EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

The phase 3 MARIPOSA trial (NCT04487080) evaluating amivantamab-vmjw (Rybrevant) and lazertinib (Lacluze) and the phase 3 FLAURA2 trial (NCT04035486) evaluating osimertinib (Tagrisso) with or without chemotherapy.1,2 Both studied patients who had untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

In the MARIPOSA trial, the experimental regimen elicited a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 23.7 months when compared with 16.6 months from osimertinib alone (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.85; P <.001). In the FLAURA2 trial, the median follow-up for PFS was 19.5 months in the osimertinib and chemotherapy group and 16.5 months in the osimertinib alone group.

One of the major questions still facing the physician community, however, is how to decide which patients need escalated therapy. It could be patients with an L858R mutation, with baseline brain metastasis, or with a significant burden of disease, Bestvina noted.

Transcript:

The frontline [EGFR-mutated NSCLC] space is exciting right now. We’ve seen promising results thus far from both the MARIPOSA [regimen] as well as the FLAURA2 regimen, in addition to what we previously had, which is osimertinib monotherapy. We’re still trying to understand what patients need escalated therapy, whether that’s osimertinib plus chemotherapy or amivantamab plus lazertinib in the front line because there are patients who do not perform as well despite having an EGFR mutation. Is that patients who have an L858R mutation? Is that patients with baseline brain metastasis? Are those patients who have a significant burden of disease? I’m discussing these more aggressive or escalated treatment options with patients right now, but we need some longer-term overall survival data to help discuss with patients what is the best treatment of choice for them.

References

  1. Cho BC, Lu S, Felip E, et al. Amivantamab plus lazertinib in previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(16):1486-1498. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2403614
  2. Planchard D, Jänne PA, Cheng Y, et al. Osimertinib with or without chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(21):1935-1948. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2306434

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
4 experts in this video
4 experts in this video
“Dendritic cell vaccines, CAR T-cell therapy, and things of that nature are holding some promise,” said Andrew Brenner, MD, PhD.
Related Content