Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthInteractive ToolsNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe

Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!

scout
Advertisement

Health-Related Quality of Life Complimented Efficacy/Safety With T-DXd in Breast Cancer

December 13, 2024
By Kyle Doherty
Fact checked by Chris Ryan
News
Article
Conference|San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS)

Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki treatment showed that HRQOL and neurological function were related to the efficacy and safety profile of patients.

Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki treatment showed that HRQOL and neurological function were related to the efficacy and safety profile of patients.

Results from the multicenter, open-label phase 3b/4 DESTINY trial (NCT04739761) shared at the 2024 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) showed that, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with or without brain metastases, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and neurological function were linked with the safety profile and efficacy data of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki.1

At the February 8, 2024, data cutoff, the estimated 12-month deterioration-free rate in terms of global health status (GHS)/QOL was 40.3% (95% CI, 33.6%-46.9%) among all evaluable patients with brain metastases (n = 146). The estimated 12-month deterioration-free rates in terms of cognitive (n = 119), emotional (n = 92), physical (n = 113), role (n = 135), and social functioning (n = 118) were 53.5% (95% CI, 46.3%-68.3%), 63.3% (95% CI, 56.2%-69.6%), 56.8% (95% CI, 49.9%-63.2%), 44.5% (95% CI, 37.4%-51.4%), and 54.3% (95% CI, 47.2%-60.8%), respectively. The estimated 12-month rates regarding pain (n = 113), fatigue (n = 152), and nausea/vomiting (n = 137) were 53.4% (95% CI, 46.2%-60.1%), 40.2% (95% CI, 33.3%-47.0%), and 46.2% (95% CI, 39.4%-52.8%), respectively.

Patients with stable brain metastases (n = 87) experienced an estimated 12-month deterioration-free rate of 41.0% (95% CI, 32.3%-49.6%) in terms of GHS/QOL. The estimated 12-month deterioration-free rates in terms of cognitive (n = 71), emotional (n = 59), physical (n = 65), role (n = 79), and social functioning (n = 72) were 55.3% (95% CI, 46.0%-63.6%), 59.3% (95% CI, 50.0%-67.5%), 58.4% (95% CI, 49.3-66.4%), 44.3% (95% CI, 35.0%-53.1%), and 52.0% (95% CI, 42.8%-60.3%), respectively. The estimated 12-month rates regarding pain (n = 67), fatigue (n = 89), and nausea/vomiting (n = 78) were 52.8% (95% CI, 43.5%-61.3%), 40.3% (95% CI, 31.7%-48.9%), and 49.5% (95% CI, 40.4%-58.0%), respectively.

Patients with active brain metastases (n = 59) had an estimated 12-month deterioration-free rate of 39.2% (95% CI, 28.9%-49.4%) in terms of GHS/QOL. The estimated 12-month deterioration-free rates in terms of cognitive (n = 48), emotional (n = 33), physical (n = 48), role (n = 56), and social functioning (n = 46) were 50.9% (95% CI, 39.4%-61.3%), 70.1% (95% CI, 58.6%-78.9%), 54.6% (95% CI, 43.4%-64.5%), 45.0% (95% CI, 33.8%-55.5%), and 57.8% (95% CI, 46.4%-67.6%), respectively. The estimated 12-month rates in terms of pain (n = 46), fatigue (n = 63), and nausea/vomiting (n = 59) were 54.2% (95% CI, 42.6%-64.5%), 39.7% (95% CI, 28.4%-50.7%), and 41.3% (95% CI, 30.9%-51.3%), respectively.

The median treatment duration among all patients with brain metastases (n = 263) was 11.5 months, and 118 patients were still receiving T-DXd at the data cutoff.

“Estimated deterioration-free rates at 12 months were above 50% for cognitive, emotional, physical, and social functioning, [as well as] pain scores, regardless of the presence or absence of stable/active baseline brain metastases; further, the majority of patients had neurological stability at first score post baseline [86.6%], which was maintained throughout treatment in 55.1% of patients in the baseline brain metastases cohort and 72.9% of patients without baseline brain metastases,” Nadia Harbeck, MD, PhD, and coauthors, wrote in a poster presentation of the data. “In the baseline brain metastases cohort, mean severity on the last 24 hour scores for the majority of brain tumor–specific MDASI symptom items were less than 3 at all timepoints with assessments for more than 10 patients, on a of 0 to 10 scale where 0 was ‘not present’ and 10 was ‘as bad as you can imagine.’”

Harbeck is the director of the Breast Center, as well as the chair for Conservative Oncology and the head of the Oncological Therapy & Clinical Trials Unit in the Department of OB&GYN at LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany.

In December 2019, the FDA granted accelerated approval to T-DXd for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer following 2 or more prior anti-HER2–based regimens in the metastatic setting.2 The approval was supported by findings from the phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492). The agent then received full approval in May 2022 for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who have previously received an anti-HER2–based regimen either in the metastatic setting, or in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting, and have developed disease recurrence during or within 6 months of therapy completion.3 That approval was based on findings from the phase 3 DESTINY-Breast03 trial (NCT03529110).

DESTINY-Breast12 was a single-arm, open-label study that examined T-DXd in adult patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with or without baseline brain metastases.1 To be eligible, patients were allowed to receive up to 2 prior lines of therapy for metastatic brain cancer, excluding tucatinib (Tukysa). Other key inclusion criteria consisted of disease progression on prior HER2-directed regimens, an ECOG performance status of 1 or less, and no known or suspected leptomeningeal metastases.

Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those with baseline brain metastases and those without (n = 241). Both cohorts received intravenous T-DXd at a dose of 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Both groups were evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and NANO scale. Patients with baseline brain metastases were also evaluated using MDASI symptom items.

The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) in the brain metastases cohort and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria in the non–brain metastases cohort.4 Secondary end points included central nervous system (CNS) PFS, time to progression, duration of response, overall survival, safety, HRQOL, and neurological function.

Primary findings from DESTINY-Breast12 demonstrated that the 12-month PFS rates among all patients with brain metastases (n = 263), those with stable brain metastases (n = 157), and those with active brain metastases (n = 106), were 61.6% (95% CI, 54.9%-67.6%), 62.9% (95% CI, 54.0%-70.5%), and 59.6% (95% CI, 49.0%-68.7%), respectively. The median PFS in the overall population was 17.3 months (95% CI, 13.7-22.1). The 12-month CNS PFS rates were 58.9% (95% CI, 51.9%-65.3%), 57.8% (95% CI, 48.2%-66.1%), and 60.1% (95% CI, 49.2%-69.4%), for all patients with brain metastases, patients with stable brain metastases, and patients with active brain metastases, respectively. The respective confirmed ORRs were 51.7% (95% CI, 45.7%-57.8%), 49.7% (95% CI, 41.9%-57.5%), and 54.7% (95% CI, 45.2%-64.2%).

Additional findings from the QOL analysis showed that the estimated 12-month deterioration-free rate in terms of GHS/QOL was 44.3% (95% CI, 37.0%-51.4%) in evaluable patients without baseline brain metastases (n = 128).1 The estimated 12-month deterioration-free rates in terms of cognitive (n = 112), emotional (n = 74), physical (n = 101), role (n = 128), and social functioning (n = 112) were 54.9% (95% CI, 47.5%-61.6%), 69.1% (95% CI, 62.0%-75.1%), 61.3% (95% CI, 53.9%-67.8%), 45.3% (95% CI, 37.9%-52.5%), and 51.1% (95% CI, 43.7%-58.1%), respectively. The estimated 12-month rates regarding pain (n = 94), fatigue (n = 142), and nausea/vomiting (n = 143) were 61.2% (95% CI, 53.8%-67.8%), 38.3% (95% CI, 31.2%-45.3%), and 38.6% (95% CI, 31.7%-45.4%), respectively. The median treatment duration in the cohort of patients without brain metastases was 12.0 months.

Most patients without brain metastases (91.9%) had neuroglial stability at first score post baseline. Neuroglial stability was maintained throughout treatment in 72.9% of patients.

Disclosures: Dr Harbeck reports receiving funding from Art Tempi, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Onkowissen, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Seagen, TRIO, Viatris, West Germany Study Group and Zuelig Pharma. She also received consulting fees from Aptitude Health, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Sandoz-Hexal, Sanofi, and Seagen.

References

  1. Harbeck N, Ciruelos E, Jerusalem G, et al. Effects of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) & neurological function in patients (pts) w/ HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with or without brain metastases (BM): DESTINY-Breast12(DB-12) results. Presented at: San Antonio Breast Cancer Conference; December 10-13, 2024; San Antonio, TX. Abstract PS14-10.
  2. FDA approves fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki for unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. FDA. December 20, 2019. Accessed December 13, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-fam-trastuzumab-deruxtecan-nxki-unresectable-or-metastatic-her2-positive-breast-cancer
  3. FDA grants regular approval to fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki for breast cancer. FDA. May 4, 2022. Accessed December 13, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-grants-regular-approval-fam-trastuzumab-deruxtecan-nxki-breast-cancer
  4. Harbeck N, Ciruelos E, Jerusalem G, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with or without brain metastases: a phase 3b/4. Nat Med. Published online September 13, 2024. doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03261-7

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Subscribe Now!
Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
Related Content

Adjuvant chemotherapy with hormonotherapy in women at least 70 years of age with GGI-high risk HER2-negative breast cancer led to more AEs vs hormonotherapy alone.

Chemotherapy Confers No Survival Benefit in Older Breast Cancer Population

Roman Fabbricatore
September 3rd 2025
Article

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
September 3rd 2025
Podcast

Abemaciclib/Endocrine Therapy Improves OS in HR+/HER2– Early Breast Cancer

Abemaciclib/Endocrine Therapy Improves OS in HR+/HER2– Early Breast Cancer

Ariana Pelosci
September 3rd 2025
Article

Experts share their perspectives on updated clinical trial results, personalized cancer vaccine research, and other notable developments in kidney cancer.

Key Advances Across Kidney Cancer Research and Management at KCRS 2025

Thomas Powles, MBBS, MCRP, MD;David Braun, MD, PhD;Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD;Eric Jonasch, MD
September 3rd 2025
Podcast

FLEX study findings show that the MammaPrint Index was predictive of 5-year DRFI for endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

MammaPrint Displays Predictive Utility for Chemo in HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
September 3rd 2025
Article

Obesity and weight gain are associated with adverse outcomes following breast cancer diagnosis.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Weight Change in Patients With Breast Cancer

Sherry Shen, MD;Bethina Liu, MD;Chad Fanti, MD;Maria Bromberg, MPH;Yuan Chen, PhD;Cassandra Chang;Neil M. Iyengar, MD
September 3rd 2025
Article
Related Content

Adjuvant chemotherapy with hormonotherapy in women at least 70 years of age with GGI-high risk HER2-negative breast cancer led to more AEs vs hormonotherapy alone.

Chemotherapy Confers No Survival Benefit in Older Breast Cancer Population

Roman Fabbricatore
September 3rd 2025
Article

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
September 3rd 2025
Podcast

Abemaciclib/Endocrine Therapy Improves OS in HR+/HER2– Early Breast Cancer

Abemaciclib/Endocrine Therapy Improves OS in HR+/HER2– Early Breast Cancer

Ariana Pelosci
September 3rd 2025
Article

Experts share their perspectives on updated clinical trial results, personalized cancer vaccine research, and other notable developments in kidney cancer.

Key Advances Across Kidney Cancer Research and Management at KCRS 2025

Thomas Powles, MBBS, MCRP, MD;David Braun, MD, PhD;Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD;Eric Jonasch, MD
September 3rd 2025
Podcast

FLEX study findings show that the MammaPrint Index was predictive of 5-year DRFI for endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

MammaPrint Displays Predictive Utility for Chemo in HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer

Roman Fabbricatore
September 3rd 2025
Article

Obesity and weight gain are associated with adverse outcomes following breast cancer diagnosis.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Weight Change in Patients With Breast Cancer

Sherry Shen, MD;Bethina Liu, MD;Chad Fanti, MD;Maria Bromberg, MPH;Yuan Chen, PhD;Cassandra Chang;Neil M. Iyengar, MD
September 3rd 2025
Article
Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

259 Prospect Plains Rd, Bldg H,
Monroe, NJ 08831

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.