Hysterectomy Technique May Spread Uterine Cancer

Article

Researchers found that uterine cancers were present in 27 per 10,000 women undergoing morcellation, which fragments the uterus and can spread cancer cells.

Uterine fibroid on CT; source: Rádiológ, Wikimedia Commons.

In a study published in JAMA, researchers found that uterine cancers were present in 27 per 10,000 women undergoing hysterectomies using a minimally invasive procedure called electric power morcellation, which fragments the uterus into small pieces and can spread previously undetected uterine cancer cells.

This new evidence adds strength to arguments that doctors should be extremely cautious about using a procedure, which is performed on about 50,000 women a year, due to the risk that it may spread cancer.

Electric power morcellators have been used for 20 years. According to Jason D. Wright, MD, of the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York, and study co-authors, accurate statistics of the prevalence of malignancies among women who undergo the procedure have been lacking. In the current study, the researchers used the Perspective database, consisting of insurance information on more than 500 hospitals and encompassing about 15% of all hospitalizations, to identify women who underwent the procedure between 2006 and 2012. Most of the hospitals within the database are teaching hospitals in the southern part of the United States.

Of the 232,882 women who had a minimally invasive hysterectomy, morcellation was performed on 15.7% of the women (36,470 cases). Among those women who underwent the morcellation technique, 99 cases of uterine cancer were identified during the procedure (prevalence of 27 out of 10,000).

In addition to uterine cancer, 26 cases of other gynecologic malignancies, 39 uterine neoplasms, and 368 cases of endometrial hyperplasia were detected.

“Prevalence information is the first step in determining the risk of spreading cancer with morcellation,” write the authors in their discussion. “Although data are limited, women with apparent uterine-confined neoplasms at the time of morcellation have been found to have intraperitoneal tumor dissemination at the time of reexploration.”

The prevalence ratio of a uterine malignancy increased with increasing age, from 4.97 (women 50 to 54), to 19.37 (women 55 and 59), and to 35.97 (women older than 65).

“Patients considering morcellation should be adequately counseled about the prevalence of cancerous and precancerous conditions prior to undergoing the procedure,” conclude the authors.

Still, longer term follow-up of these women who had a uterine cancer detected at the time of their morcellation procedure is needed to understand the outcomes of these cancers and the potential pathology of the detected abnormalities.

In April, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a notice stating that the agency “discourages use of laparoscopic power morcellation for removal of uterus or uterine fibroids,” because based on available data the surgical procedure “poses risk of spreading undetected cancerous tissue in women with unsuspected cancer.”

The FDA is convening a public meeting of the Obstetrics and Gynecological Medical Devices Panel to further discuss the data and use of the morcellation procedure. In the meantime, the agency notes that other treatments, including minimally invasive surgery, such as traditional surgical vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy and myomectomy, and laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy without morcellation are valid options, as are non-surgical ones.

Related Videos
Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG discusses the use of new antibody drug conjugates for treating patients with various gynecologic cancers.
Developing novel regimens may continue to improve survival outcomes of patients with advanced cervical cancer following the FDA approval of pembrolizumab and chemoradiation, says Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD.
Treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemoradiation appears to be well tolerated with no detriment to quality of life among those with advanced cervical cancer.
Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD, says that pembrolizumab in combination with chemoradiation will be seamlessly incorporated into her institution’s treatment of those with FIGO 2014 stage III to IVA cervical cancer following the regimen’s FDA approval.
Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD, says that paying attention to the quality of chemoradiotherapy is imperative to feeling confident about the potential addition of pembrolizumab for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Guidelines from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology may help with managing the ongoing chemotherapy shortage in the treatment of patients with gynecologic cancers, according to Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG, notes that sometimes there is a need to substitute cisplatin for carboplatin, and vice versa, to best manage gynecologic cancers during the chemotherapy shortage.
Findings from the phase 3 MIRASOL trial support mirvetuximab soravtansine as a standard treatment option for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, according to Ritu Salani, MD.
Trastuzumab deruxtecan appears to elicit ‘impressive’ responses among patients with HER2-positive gynecologic cancers regardless of immunohistochemistry in the phase 2 DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial.
Ritu Salani, MD, highlights the possible benefit of a novel targeted therapy and autologous tumor vaccine in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, and in the maintenance setting after treatment for platinum-sensitive disease.
Related Content