Jeffrey Wolf, MD, on the Lack of MRD Results at ASH and the Future of Myeloma Trials

Video

Jeffrey Wolf, MD, explained how studies presented at the recent 2020 ASH Annual Meeting & Exposition did not report what percentage of patients achieved minimal residual disease negativity with therapy for multiple myeloma, and that the future of phase 3 trials should focus on this status in patients.

Jeffrey Wolf, MD, of the University of California San Francisco, spoke with CancerNetwork® regarding multiple myeloma studies presented at the 2020 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition. He mentioned they did not report what percent of patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, and that the future of phase 3 trials should focus on MRD status.

Transcription:

We’ve shown regularly that achieving MRD negativity results in better outcomes. , and When we introduced new therapies at ASH just this last weekend, there was not 1 study of 1 new agent—whether it’s a T-cell engager, sometimes known as a BiTE, or a CAR T-cell [therapy]—that when the investigators reported their results, they also reported what percent [of patients] achieved MRD negativity. And The same thing will occur with randomized phase 3 studies, for example, in which some of our therapies are so good that we wait years to see ultimate outcomes. , when Many of us in the field believe that if we measure MRD at certain time points, we could already predict which arm is the better arm, whether its therapy A or therapy B, by what percentage [of patients] achieve MRD negativity. That would shorten the time period for which you have to follow these studies so that you could then take that information and move on to the next one.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
Despite CD19 CAR T-cell therapy exhibiting efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma, less than half achieve long-term remission.
Current findings from the phase 1/2 CaDAnCe-101 trial show no predictive factors of improved responses with BGB-16673 in patients with CLL or SLL.
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Related Content