Lenvatinib/Pembrolizumab Combo Improved Efficacy Over Sunitinib Across RCC Risk Groups


Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was efficacious for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and performed well in subgroup analyses of International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk categories and target kidney lesions.

Lenvatinib (Lenvima) plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) improved efficacy outcomes compared with sunitinib (Sutent) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) across evaluable International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk subgroups, according to research presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.

Improvements were observed in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR) in the multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 CLEAR trial (NCT02811861).

“Overall, our results indicated that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab has improved efficacy parameters and outcome parameters compared to sunitinib in all subgroups of patients,” Viktor Grünwald, MD, of the University Hospital Essen in Essen, Germany, explained in his presentation of the data.

Of the 1069 patients enrolled in the CLEAR study, 335 were assigned to the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm and 357 were assigned to the sunitinib arm. Median patients age in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and sunitinib arms was 64 years (range, 34-88) and 61 years (range, 29-82), respectively.

By IMDC risk groups, the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab population had 31.0% with favorable-risk disease, 59.2% intermediate, and 9.3% poor risk. Patients in the sunitinib group had 34.7% with favorable risk, 53.8% intermediate, and 10.4% poor risk.

Focusing on PFS, patients in the IMDC–intermediate/poor risk subgroup treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab had a median PFS of 22.1 months compared with 5.9 months for patients treated with sunitinib (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.28-0.47). In the IMDC–favorable risk subgroup, the median PFS was 28.1 months compared with 12.9 months, respectively (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.48-0.62).

The OS data also favored lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in both the IMDC–intermediate/poor risk (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42-0.80) and IMDC–favorable risk subgroups (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.55-2.40), although evaluating OS was considered inadequate due to too few events.

A 72.4% ORR was observed in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm compared with 28.8% ORR in the sunitinib arm when evaluating the IMDC–intermediate/poor risk subgroup (odds ratio, 6.60; 95% CI, 4.39-9.90). For the IMDC–favorable risk subgroup, the ORRs were 68.2% and 50.8%, respectively (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.17-3.42).

The investigative team also analyzed efficacy data via target kidney lesions, with median PFS favored in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm (22.1 months) over the sunitinib arm (7.5 months) for patients with target lesions (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.25-0.65). For patients without target kidney lesions, corresponding medians were 25.8 months and 9.4 months, respectively (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30-0.49).

The ORRs were consistently favored in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arms regardless of target kidney lesion status. Specifically, the ORR was 71.8% compared with 27% with target kidney lesions (odds ratio, 10.55; 95% CI, 4.54-24.52) and 70.8% versus 38.5% without target kidney lesions (odds ratio, 3.78; 95% CI, 2.66-5.37).

In the intent-to-treat population of patients in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm, complete responses were maintained in 79.3% of patients at 24 months and 74.3% of patients at 36 months.

More, in the 6-month landmark analysis, confirmed response or a reduction in target lesions of more than 75% were observed in 12.4% of patients in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm compared with 4.5% of patients in the sunitinib arm.

“All patients with complete response to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab at 6 months were alive at 2 years; similar survival rates were observed for patients who had more than a 75% reduction in target lesions,” wrote the investigators in their poster of the data.

“Notably, patients with complete response or near complete response derived tremendous benefit from this type of combination,” continued Grünwald in his presentation.

The CLEAR study randomized patients 1:1:1 to receive oral lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks, lenvatinib 18 mg plus oral everolimus (Afinitor) 5 mg once daily, or oral sunitinib 50 mg once daily for 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off.

The study’s primary end point was PFS, with focal secondary end points of OS and ORR. Safety was also evaluated.

These results suggest that lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab could be considered as a potential new treatment option in the first-line setting for patients with advanced RCC.


Grünwald V, Powles T, Kopyltsov E, et al. Analysis of the CLEAR study in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Depth of response and efficacy for selected subgroups in the lenvatinib (LEN) + pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) and sunitinib (SUN) treatment arms. J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 4560). 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4560.

Related Videos
Investigators must continue to explore the space for lisocabtagene maraleucel in mantle cell lymphoma, according to Manali Kamdar, MD.
Those with CML should discuss adverse effects such as nausea or fatigue with their providers to help optimize their quality of life during treatment.
Patients with CML can become an active part of their treatment plan by discussing any questions that come to mind with their providers.
Jorge E. Cortes, MD, emphasizes proper communication between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and their providers during the treatment course.
Dietary interventions or other medications may help mitigate diarrhea in patients who undergo therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Whether CAR T-cell therapy or T-cell engagers should dominate the multiple myeloma landscape may be hard to determine, says David S. Siegel, MD.
Next steps for research in the multiple myeloma space may include the development of novel CAR T-cell strategies and bispecific antibodies.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Adverse effects associated with oral azacitidine in low- or intermediate-risk MDS are typically transient, according to Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, MS.
Related Content