Luciano Costa, MD, PhD, Discusses Use of Daratumumab Plus KRd in Multiple Myeloma

Video

Luciano Costa, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential application of daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma in a real-world setting.

At the 2021 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, Luciano Costa, MD, PhD, associate director for Clinical Research at O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, discussed how the primary end point results of the MASTER trial (NCT03224507) can be used in the real-world treatment setting to guide selection of daratumumab (Darzalex), carfilzomib (Kyprolis), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone for patients with multiple myeloma. 

Transcript:

What we learned from this study is that we have been treating myeloma the same way, with decisions made mostly on transplant eligibility. The reality is patients respond very differently, and I think different paths of response require different actions. It is the first steppingstone for response-adaptive therapy. The way our group wants to go is to optimize quadruple therapy, perhaps with a longer induction. For patients who [are] minimal residual disease [MRD] negative already after induction, we need to ask the de-escalation questions. Maybe those people can do very well, even without transplant, and we want to try to answer them in a randomized way. Conversely, for patients who remain MRD positive after transplant, we need to engage new agents here. We would like to compare transplant followed by conventional care with transplant followed by an anti–B-cell maturation antigen [BCMA] agent. There are many ways this can be framed and designed, but I think we need to embrace the notion that response after quadruple therapy sought out patients who are candidates for de-escalation and patients who are candidates for escalation therapy.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Related Content