Lyudmila Bazhenova, MD, Discusses Potential for Trials Featuring Combination IO/Targeted Therapy for EGFR Exon 20+ and Wild Type NSCLC

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Lyudmilia Bazhenova, MD, at the 2021 World Conference on Lung Cancer to talk about the feasibility of immunotherapy trials in wild-type and EGFR exon 20 insertion non–small cell lung cancer.

At the 2021 World Conference on Lung Cancer, CancerNetwork® spoke with Lyudmilia Bazhenova, MD, of University of California at San Diego, about why she would not recommend conducting another trial utilizing a single agent immune checkpoint inhibitor in wild-type and EGFR exon 20 insertion non–small cell lung cancer. However, she noted that there may be potential for a trial utilizing immunotherapy plus a lung cancer vaccine.

Transcript:

At this point I’m not aware of any of any trial, and I would be reluctant to do the trial with traditionally approved checkpoint inhibition because I think it’s unlikely that they’re going to work. If we would have a combinatorial immunotherapy trial of maybe a combination of lung cancer vaccines and immunotherapy, I think one can envision doing it. [However], in my practice, I do not use checkpoint inhibition for those patients, and I don’t think I would be comfortable enrolling the patient to a monotherapy immune checkpoint inhibition trial.

Reference

Bazhenova L, Girard N, Minchom A, et al. Comparative clinical outcomes between EGFR Exon20ins and wildtype NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Presented at: 2021 World Conference on Lung Cancer; September 8-14, 2021. Virtual. Accessed September 27, 2021. Abstract P08.04

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Related Content