NCI, EPA Attempt to Resolve Differences Over Childhood Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 7 No 3
Volume 7
Issue 3

BETHESDA, Md--Officials of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are attempting to resolve their conflicting interpretations of data regarding cancer in children. The NCI has forcefully challenged the EPA’s contention that the United States is in the midst of an epidemic of childhood malignancies.

BETHESDA, Md--Officials of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are attempting to resolve their conflicting interpretations of data regarding cancer in children. The NCI has forcefully challenged the EPA’s contention that the United States is in the midst of an epidemic of childhood malignancies.

An EPA conference last September declared that cancer in US children has increased steadily over the last quarter century and that the situation demands a focused program to determine the cause of the increase and find means of prevention. This led to a reassessment by NCI epidemiologists of data from the Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.

Martha Linet, MD, who led the NCI review, said that her group found "no evidence of a consistent increase in the incidence during 1973 to 1994 for specific types of childhood cancer."

In late January, senior EPA and NCI officials met for more than 2 hours to discuss the childhood cancer data, Hugh W. McKinnon, MD, of EPA’s National Risk Management Research Laboratory in Cincinnati, reported at the NCAB February meeting. They agreed that staff scientists from the two agencies would hold further meetings to try to resolve the conflicting interpretation of the childhood cancer statistics.

"Honest scientists will have honest disagreements over data, and we are trying to understand that data," Dr. McKinnon told Oncology News International.

Related Videos
Cretostimogene grenadenorepvec’s efficacy compares favorably with the current nonsurgical standards of care in high-risk, Bacillus Calmette Guerin–unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.
Panelists smiling at camera on a blue background.
Panelists smiling at camera on a blue background.
Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.
Treatment with tisotumab vedotin may be a standard of care in second- or third-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, says Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
A panel of 4 experts on multiple myeloma seated at a long table
A panel of 4 experts on multiple myeloma seated at a long table
Related Content