Neal D. Shore, MD, on the Importance of Multidisciplinary Care in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Video

Neal D. Shore, MD, FACS, discusses the importance of multidisciplinary care for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Neal D. Shore, MD, FACS, regarding the importance of multidisciplinary care for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Incorporating a multidisciplinary approach for patients with advanced prostate cancer is essential in order to provide patients with further therapeutic benefit and improve quality of life.

Transcript:

When we are taking care of our patients with advanced cancers, and advanced prostate cancer is no exception, fatigue and the spectrum of neurocognitive maladies, as well as cardio-oncologic maladies become that much more important. All across the field of cancer in its totality, [we] are recognizing this. [By] incorporating a multidisciplinary approach, either as the [urologic] oncologist, the medical oncologist, the radiation oncologist, the nuclear medicine radiologist, or the pathologist—whoever is really involved in the care of the patient—appreciating that the spectrum of cardio-oncologic and neuro-oncologic differences in drugs of the same therapeutic class need to be studied [is important]. It may not affect all patients, it may not affect most patients, but there [are] clearly going to be certain patients or a significant population of patients [for whom] the right drug selection and comparable therapeutic mechanism of action classes could really benefit a patient and help their quality of life.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Related Content