(P018) Low-Dose-Rate, Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy Is an Effective Treatment Option for Men Less Than 55 Years Old With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Prostate brachytherapy is an effective treatment for men younger than 55 years with low-risk prostate cancer. Prostate brachytherapy should be considered for all men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer, regardless of age.

Brian J. Moran, MD, Michelle H. Braccioforte, MS, MPH, Gregory C. Treharne, MD; Prostate Cancer Foundation of Chicago; Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To ascertain the effectiveness of low-dose-rate, interstitial, permanent prostate brachytherapy (PB) treatment in a large series of “young” patients with prostate cancer, treated at a single institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients aged < 55 years treated with PB for low-risk prostate cancer between November 1997 and October 2012. Inclusion criteria were low-risk prostate cancer as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines of Gleason Score (GS) 6 or less, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10.0 ng/mL, and clinical stage ≤ T2a. A total of 332 patients meeting these criteria were identified; however, follow-up PSA data were available for 177 patients. Mean age was 51.3 years; mean follow-up was 4.89 years (range: 2 mo–15 yr). The mean pretreatment PSA was 5.66 ng/mL (range: 0.6–9.9 ng/mL). All patients underwent PB with 131Cs, 103Pd, or 125I. Four patients also received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and 12 patients received androgen deprivation therapy as part of their treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of PB, using Kaplan-Meier statistics.

RESULTS: In this cohort of patients, there were five PSA failures (as defined by the Phoenix definition) and four deaths (unrelated to prostate cancer). PFS was 96.2% at 5 years and 95.3% at 10 years; OS was 99.3% at 5 years and 89.4% at 10 years.

CONCLUSION: PB is an effective treatment for men aged < 55 years with low-risk prostate cancer. PB should be considered for all men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer, regardless of age.

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital
(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
(S008) The Effect of Simulation and Treatment Delays for Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy in the Era of Risk Stratification Using Smoking and Human Papilloma Virus Status
(S009) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on Three-Year Toxicity
(S011) Comparative Study Between Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch After Cystectomy for Patients With Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
(S010) Computed Tomography–Assessed Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer
(S012) Quantitative Imaging to Evaluate the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cysts
(S013) Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(S014) The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected, High-Risk Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis
(S016) The Impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content