(P023) The Importance of Surgery and the Role of Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Oral Tongue Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

Oral tongue cancers have been classically managed with upfront surgical resection, whereas radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) have been generally reserved in the adjuvant setting for patients who possess high-risk features and those with unresectable disease. We wanted to determine the role of RT, surgery, and CT for patients with oral tongue cancer.

Veeral B. Patel, MD, Kavitha Mannava, BS, Margaret Formica, PhD, Michael Lacombe, MD, Jack Hsu, MD, Ajeet Gajra, MD, Seung S. Hahn, MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Department of Otolaryngology, Department of Medicine, Upstate Medical University

Background: Oral tongue cancers have been classically managed with upfront surgical resection, whereas radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) have been generally reserved in the adjuvant setting for patients who possess high-risk features and those with unresectable disease. Although surgical resection is a vital component for management of oral tongue cancer, CT and RT have been shown to be beneficial in both early-stage patients with high-risk features and those with locally advanced disease as well. We wanted to determine the role of RT, surgery, and CT for patients with oral tongue cancer.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of 94 patients was conducted for patients diagnosed with and treated for oral tongue cancer at SUNY Upstate University Hospital between 2001 and 2011. Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained prior to initiation of the study. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included local relapse (LR) rates at both the primary site and the neck. Early-stage patients were classified as stage I/II, and late-stage patients were classified as stage III/IV. OS and LR were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to determine prognostic features affecting OS and LR rates. Treatment results were analyzed with respect to surgery, RT, and CT as part of the overall management.

Results: The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 61.1 months. The breakdown for stages was I (n = 31), II (n = 14), III (n = 8), and IV (n = 31); 53% of the patients were early-stage and 47% was late-stage. The 2-year and 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 67.5% and 52.2%, respectively. The median survival for the entire cohort was 61.1 months. Further, 77.8% of the early-stage patients were treated with surgery alone, and 13.3% was treated with surgery/RT, and their survival was 80% and 50%, respectively. For late-stage patients, the OS for those treated with surgery/RT/CT (n = 15), surgery alone (n = 7), and RT/CT (n = 6) was 66.7%, 42.9%, and 16.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis for OS showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.663 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91–7.62) for patients who did not have surgery. Alcohol (HR = 2.354; 95% CI, 1.054–5.255), higher grade (HR = 2.779; 95% CI, 1.059–7.294), and higher T-stage (HR = 3.77; 95% CI, 1.622–8.797) were statistically significant for poor prognostic features for OS. The median time to local recurrence to either the primary site or neck for the entire cohort was 7.4 months. Multivariate analysis for local recurrence showed that not having surgery (HR = 8.113; 95% CI, 1.599–41.172) and positive margins after resection (HR = 8.365; 95% CI, 1.682–41.596) conferred a worse prognosis.

Conclusion: Oral tongue cancer is an infrequently encountered malignancy that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Surgery remains the cornerstone for management of these patients. Early-stage patients do well with surgery alone, whereas late-stage patients tend to do better with CT and RT in addition to surgery.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content