(P099) A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Management of Patients Diagnosed With Stage IV Anal Canal Cancer: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

This retrospective study presents the results of a multidisciplinary approach adopted in two cancer centers where patients diagnosed with stage IV SCC of the anal canal (liver-predominant disease) and a good performance status (ECOG 0–2) were offered a full course of concomitant chemoradiation followed by cisplatin-based palliative chemotherapy.

Lorraine Portelance, MD, Neil Kopek, MD, Peter Hosein, MD, Maria Restrepo, MD, Caio Rocha-Lima, MD, Joe Levi, MD, Omar Mahmoud, MD, Adrian Ishkanian, MD, Govindarajan Narayanan, MD, Ike Akuniyli, MD; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami; McGill University Health Center

Background: While there is a large amount of literature published on the management of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer presenting with liver-predominant metastatic disease, there is a paucity of data on the management of patients with stage IV squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal who have the same pattern of presentation. This retrospective study presents the results of a multidisciplinary approach adopted in two cancer centers where patients diagnosed with stage IV SCC of the anal canal (liver-predominant disease) and a good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0–2) were offered a full course of concomitant chemoradiation followed by cisplatin-based palliative chemotherapy. In addition, for the patients who achieved a complete local response in the pelvis, consideration was given to proceed with local treatment of the liver metastasis (either by surgery or radioablation).

Methods: An institutional review board (IRB)-approved anal cancer databank including two institutions was queried to identify patients who presented with liver-predominant metastasis at diagnosis. A detailed retrospective review of the medical records was performed to capture demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as treatment delivery, response, toxicity, and survival.

Results: Between May 2009 and September 2013, a total of 11 patients were diagnosed with SCC of the anal canal and had liver-predominant metastatic disease at presentation. The median age was 53 years, and three patients were HIV-positive. The median follow-up was 23.6 months (range: 2–53 mo). Ten patients completed the full course of chemoradiation therapy with the Nigro protocol (mitomycin/fluorouracil and 54 Gy of external beam radiotherapy). Patients went on to receive systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin/fluorouracil. This was then followed by resection of residual liver metastases in seven patients and transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres in one patient. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 87% and 27%, respectively. Complete response of the primary pelvic disease was documented during follow-up in 70% of the patients. These results were achieved with acceptable treatment-related toxicity. The most frequent acute toxicity encountered was reversible myelosuppression and radiation enteritis. No deaths were directly related to therapy.

Conclusion: Patients with anal canal SCC usually have significant pelvic symptoms at diagnosis from their primary disease. In our series, patients with liver-predominant stage IV disease had a high 2-year survival rate. Our experience suggests that upfront concomitant chemoradiation plays a significant role in controlling the pelvic symptoms in this population. Moreover, when an aggressive treatment approach was used, 27% was disease-free at 2 years, suggesting that the approach to patients with oligometastatic disease used in colorectal cancer may also be of benefit in patients with anal canal SCC.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content