(P102) Effectiveness and Toxicity of Yttrium-90 Microsphere Brachytherapy

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

Here, we report findings from a series of 82 Y-90 microsphere brachytherapy treatments.

Craig J. Baden, MD, MPH, John D. Roberson, BS, AB, Rojymon Jacob, MD, Omer L. Burnett III, MD; University of Alabama, Birmingham

Introduction: By exploiting the liver’s dual blood supply and the beta-emission of yttrium-90 (Y-90), microsphere brachytherapy enables treatment of primary or metastatic liver tumors with tumoricidal radiation doses while preferentially sparing normal liver parenchyma. Though utilization of Y-90 microsphere brachytherapy continues to increase, data regarding toxicity and effectiveness remain limited. Here, we report findings from a series of 82 Y-90 microsphere brachytherapy treatments.

Patients and Methods: Between October 2010 and August 2013, a total of 59 patients underwent 82 treatments with Y-90 SIR-Spheres at our tertiary care academic medical center. Median patient age was 60 years (range: 33–82 yr), and median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 80% (range: 40%–90%). Seventy-two treatments were completed in patients with Child-Pugh class A disease and 10 in class B. Of the 82 treatments, 36 (43.9%) were to colorectal carcinoma metastases, 15 (18.3%) to neuroendocrine tumors, 11 (13.4%) to cholangiocarcinoma, 5 (6.1%) to hepatocellular carcinoma, 5 (6.1%) to breast carcinoma, and 10 (12.2%) to other tumor types. The majority of radioembolization treatments were preceded by other therapies, including systemic therapy in 87.8%, liver resection in 18.3%, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in 14.6%, and radiofrequency ablation in 4.9%. The median maximum radiographic lesion size was 49 mm (range: 12–200 mm). Median treated tumor volume was 90.7 mL (range: 5–3,096 mL), constituting a median of 9.1% (range: 1.1%–78.5%) of the treated lobe. Median activity of microspheres was 1.03 GBq (range: 0–2.1 GBq). Procedures were uncomplicated in 73.2% of cases, while 15.9% developed stasis and 9.8% developed reflux. We collected laboratory, imaging, and other clinical data from the pretreatment visit as well as at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month and subsequent follow-up visits in order to determine toxicity, effectiveness, and survival associated with treatment.

Results: Acute toxicities of treatment were generally very mild and included fatigue (45.1%), anorexia (15.9%), weight loss (6.1%), abdominal discomfort (36.6%), nausea (24.4%), hepatic encephalopathy (12.2%), jaundice (3.7%), and ascites (3.7%). Grade 2 or higher laboratory toxicities included derangements of alkaline phosphatase (24.4%), albumin (23.2%), total bilirubin (19.5%), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (12.2%), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (3.7%), and international normalized ratio (INR) (3.7%).

Radiographic response was measured at 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Of 48 treatments with available imaging after 3 months, 25.0% showed partial response, 29.2% stable disease, and 45.8% progression. Median change in the maximum lesion diameter after 3 months was +1 mm (range: -22–92 mm). Six-month imaging was available for 28 treatments, with 28.6% demonstrating partial response, 42.9% stable, and 28.6% progression. Median change after 6 months was +1 mm (range: -47–70 mm). At 3 months, only 22.2% of neuroendocrine tumors had progressed, whereas 72.2% of colorectal carcinoma had progressed (P = .04). Radiographic response was not significantly associated with tumor diameter, tumor volume, previous chemotherapy, TACE, or liver resection.

Median survival from time of first treatment was 37.4 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.4–45.7). There were no significant differences in survival with respect to Child-Pugh class, tumor volume, tumor diameter, previous TACE, or previous systemic therapy.

Conclusion: Findings from this institutional series corroborate the safety of Y-90 microsphere radioembolization and demonstrate its effectiveness in treating a variety of unresectable primary and metastatic liver tumors.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Related Content