Pembrolizumab Plus Lenvatinib May Serve as Potential Frontline Treatment for Non–Clear Cell RCC


Patients with locally advanced/metastatic non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma experienced promising preliminary antitumor activity following treatment with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in the first line.

Lenvatinib (Lenvima) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in the frontline demonstrated promising responses at 24 weeks or more of follow-up in patients with locally advanced/metastatic non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), according to preliminary findings from the single-arm, open-label phase 2 KEYNOTE-B61 trial (NCT04704219).

The overall response rate (ORR) in patients treated with the combination (n = 82) was 47.6% (95% CI, 36.4%-58.9%) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 79.3% (95% CI, 68.9%-87.4%). When responses were assessed by disease histology, investigators reported an ORR by blinded independent central review (BICR) of 52.9% (n = 27/51; 95% CI, 38.5%-67.1%) for papillary RCC, 13.3% (n = 2/15; 95% CI, 1.7%-40.5%) for chromophobe RCC, 60.0% (n = 3/5; 95% CI, 14.7%-94.7%) for translocation RCC, 71.4% (n = 5/7; 95% CI, 29.0%-96.3%) for unclassified RCC, and 50.0% (n = 2/4; 95% CI, 6.8%-93.2%) for other types of RCC.

Patients were eligible to participate in the study if they had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of non­­­–clear cell RCC, locally advanced or metastatic disease, and did not undergo previous treatment with a systematic therapy. Other inclusion criteria included measurable disease based on RECIST v1.1 criteria, available tumor tissue sample, and a Karnofsky performance status of at least 70%.

The treatment regimen consisted of an intravenous 400 mg dose of pembrolizumab every 6 weeks for 18 or less cycles for approximately 2 years and 20 mg of oral lenvatinib every day. Initial tumor occurred 12 weeks from the allocation of treatment, with subsequent assessments taking place once every 6 weeks and once every 12 weeks thereafter.

The primary end point of the trial was ORR by BICR, with secondary end points including DCR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety. At the time of the analysis, median PFS, DOR, and OS had yet to be reached.

A total of 147 patients received treatment with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib and treatment was ongoing in 123 patients. A total of 24 patients discontinued treatment; reasons for discontinuation included progressive disease (n = 13), adverse effects (AEs; n = 6), clinical progression (n = 2), patient decision (n = 2), and physician decision (n = 1). Eighty-two patients were included in the efficacy population.

Within the efficacy population, the median patient age was 64 years (range of 24-87). A total of 67.1% of patients had a combined positive score (CPS) of 1 or more and 26.8% had a CPS of less than 1. In terms of histology, 62.2% of diseases were papillary, 18.3% were chromophobe, 8.5% were unclassified, 6.1% were translocation, and 4.9% were another disease type.

The best percentage change in tumor burden from baseline by BICR was 86.5% for the overall population; 86.3% for the papillary cohort; 80.0% in the chromophobe cohort; and 93.4% for the unclassified, translocation, and other cohort. At a median follow-up of 8.2 months, the median time to response was 2.8 months. Moreover, the median DOR was not reached (NR). At the data cut-off, all patients who achieved a complete response were continuing treatment.

At a median follow-up of 8.2 months, the PFS rate by BICR was 72.3% (95% CI, 60.7%-81.0%) and the median PFS was NR (95% CI, 8.4-NR). The OS rate at the same follow-up was 87.8% (95% CI, 78.5%-93.2%) and the median OS was not reached (95% CI, NR-NR).

Any grade treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) were observed in 86.4% of patients who received at least 1 dose of treatment; no grade 5 TRAEs occurred. The most common any grades TRAEs included hypertension (48.3%), diarrhea (25.2%), hypothyroidism (25.2%), dysphoria (24.5%), fatigue (22.4%), and palmar-planter erythrodysesthesia (21.1%). The most frequent grade 3/4 TRAEs were hypertension, proteinuria, stomatitis, asthenia, and palmar-planter erythrodysesthesia.

These data were presented at the 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress.


Albiges L, Gurney H, Atduev V, et al. Phase II KEYNOTE-B61 study of pembrolizumab (pembro) + lenvatinib (lenva) as first-line treatment for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). Ann Oncol. 2022;33(suppl 7):S660-S680. doi:10.1016/annonc/annonc1072

Related Videos
Considering cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer may help with managing the shortage of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, according to Joshua J. Meeks, MD, PhD, BS.
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and visceral disease may particularly benefit from enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, according to Amanda Nizam, MD.
High-grade adverse effects with zanidatamab plus palbociclib and fulvestrant seem to be uncommon in patients with HER2-positive, hormone receptor–positive, metastatic breast cancer, according to Sara Hurvitz, MD, FACP.
Black male patients with breast cancer appear to experience worse survival outcomes compared with White patients when controlling for clinicopathological variables, according to Jason (Jincong) Q. Freeman, MPH, MS.
Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E4112 trial appear to support the use of DCIS scores for identifying patients with breast cancer who may be eligible to omit radiotherapy following MRI-guided surgery.
Providers should inform patients with breast cancer that selecting later-line therapies following prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a “developing area,” says Abigail M. Johnston, JD.
Data from the phase 3 NATALEE trial highlight a positive toxicity profile for ribociclib as an adjuvant therapy for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, says Neil M. Iyengar, MD.
Future research will focus on ctDNA dynamics change over time in the full translational cohort of patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the phase 3 monarchE study, says Stephanie L. Graff, MD.
Findings from a National Cancer Database analysis highlight no statistically significant differences in survival outcomes with chemotherapy for patients over 81 years old with triple-negative breast cancer compared with those who do not receive chemotherapy.
Related Content