Potential Biomarkers Identified in Post-Hoc Analysis of Apalutamide Plus ADT in mCRPC

Article

A post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 TITAN trial revealed potential biomarkers that may predict overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy.

A post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 TITAN trial (NCT02489318) revealed potential biomarkers to help predict overall survival (OS) with apalutamide (Erleada) plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) as treatment for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), according to data presented at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.


Specifically, “Detection of circulating tumor (ct)DNA or select androgen receptor (AR) and non-AR biomarkers at baseline or end of study treatment (EOST) may be associated with worse survival [with apalutamide/ADT] among patients with mCSPC,” lead study author Neeraj Agarwal, MD, Huntsman Cancer institute, and coauthors wrote in a poster they shared at the 2022 ASCO Annual Meeting.

Overall, the TITAN trial (NCT02489318) randomized 1052 patients with mCSPC 1:1 to receive apalutamide plus ADT or placebo plus ADT. Results of the primary and final analyses of the trial showed that adding apalutamide to ADT led to a significant benefit in OS and radiographic progression-free survival versus ADT alone.

For the biomarker analysis, Agarwal et al used next-generation sequencing to analyze ctDNA and genomic aberrations in 17 prostate cancer–related genes at baseline and at EOST. Baseline data were available for 114 patients and EOST data were available for 129 patients. Using statistical modeling, the investigators evaluated associations of ctDNA/aberrations detected at baseline and EOST with OS, as well as associations of ctDNA/aberrations detected at EOST with OS on subsequent therapies.

The investigators reported that the following aberrations occurred in ≥15% of the baseline population across both treatment arms: any genomic AR aberration, AR amplification, TP53,

HRR pathway (BRCA1, BRCA2, FANCA, BRIP1, HDAC2, CDK12, ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2), RB1, PTEN, and PIK3CA.

At baseline, 36% (41/114) of patients had detectable ctDNA, of which 27% (11/41) had any genomic AR aberration and 24% (10/41) had AR gene amplification. In this period from baseline to EOST, there was a significant increase in the presence of these biomarkers. At EOST, 75% (97/129) of patients had detectable ctDNA, of which 67% (65/97) had any genomic AR aberration and 63% (61/97) had AR gene amplification. All of these increases were statistically significant (P <.001 for EOST vs BL for all 3).

There was also an increase in the most prevalent non-AR aberrations at BL, however none of these increases was statistically significant:

  • TP53: 41% at baseline to 54% at EOST (P = .2 for EOST vs BL)
  • HRR pathway: 22% to 27% (P = .5)
  • RB1: 20% to 33% (P = .11)
  • PTEN: 20% to 32% (P = .14)
  • PIK3CA: 15% to 30% (P = .06)

The investigators also reported that multivariate analyses from both treatment groups showed that the baseline biomarkers of ctDNA (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.11-3.31; P = .0190) and any AR genomic aberrations (HR, 6.68; 95% CI, 1.68-26.49; P = .0069) were significantly associated with poor OS.

Similarly, multivariate analyses from both treatment groups also showed that the EOST biomarkers of any AR genomic aberration (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.02-2.69; P = .0431) and PI3K pathway aberrations (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.39-3.59; P = .0009) were associated with poor OS.

The researchers also conducted univariate analyses of the population of patients who were treated with subsequent therapy, comprised of 106 patients who received chemotherapy and 161 patients who received hormonal therapy. The only notable findings with this assessment was that, among patients receiving chemotherapy, OS was worse among patients with PIK3CA activation (HR, 3.7; P < .05), PI3K pathway activation (HR, 2.4; P <.05), or TP53 inactivation (HR, 3.0; P <.01) at EOST.

In their poster summary, Agarwal et al noted, “The predictive value of these biomarkers for survival in mCSPC needs further confirmation.”

Reference

Agarwal N, Lucas J, Aguilar-Bonavides C, et al. Genomic aberrations associated with overall survival (OS) in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with apalutamide (APA) or placebo (PBO) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in TITAN. J Clin Oncol. 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 5066). doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5066

Related Videos
Artificial intelligence programs may help introduce new care strategies that minimize the risk of adverse effects in patients with prostate cancer, according to Wayne G. Brisbane, MD.
An artificial intelligence algorithm appears to create accurate focal treatment margins in patients with prostate cancer, according to Wayne G. Brisbane, MD.
Artificial intelligence may be useful in screening for prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels who have undergone MRI, according to Wayne G. Brisbane, MD.
Common adverse effects following treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the phase 3 CLEAR study include diarrhea, hypertension, and fatigue, according to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP.
Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab appears to raise no new safety signals in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma after 4 years of follow-up in the phase 3 CLEAR study.
According to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP, 4-year follow-up data from the phase 3 CLEAR study confirm the maintained benefits of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Findings from the phase 3 MIRASOL trial support mirvetuximab soravtansine as a standard treatment option for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, according to Ritu Salani, MD.
Rana R. McKay, MD discusses presentations of interest that were presented at the 2023 Kidney Cancer Research Summit, including a discussion on how PET imaging may identify which patients with renal cell carcinoma may respond to immunotherapy.
A better understanding of tumor biology may be necessary for identifying novel non-immunotherapy–based therapeutic strategies for patients with renal cell carcinoma, according to Rana R. McKay, MD.
Probiotics and other agents targeting fatty acid oxidation are also under evaluation as treatment options for patients with renal cell carcinoma, according to Rana R. McKay, MD.