Ruxolitinib Combo Elicits Responses in Small GVHD Population

News
Article

Large studies may be warranted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and durability of response in patients who receive ruxolitinib plus belumosudil for graft-versus-host disease, according to the authors of a retrospective analysis.

“Response was observed with the combination despite progression on both agents as monotherapy, which may suggest synergistic effects in targeting different inflammatory pathways," according to the study authors.

“Response was observed with the combination despite progression on both agents as monotherapy, which may suggest synergistic effects in targeting different inflammatory pathways," according to the study authors.

Investigators reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 55% with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) plus belumosudil (Rezurock) in small cohort of patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), according to findings of a single-center retrospective analysis presented at the 2024 Tandem Meeting.1

“Response was observed with the combination despite progression on both agents as monotherapy, which may suggest synergistic effects in targeting different inflammatory pathways. The combination is tolerable, delays the need for alternative therapies, and facilitates the tapering of corticosteroids,” investigators wrote in the poster.

The ORR, which included complete responses (CR) (n=1, 5%) and partial responses (PR) (n=7, 35%), was 55% in 11 of the 20 patients at any time during the analysis (95% CI, 0.32 - 0.77). However, 1 patient was excluded due to insufficient treatment time. There were 3 patients (15%) who experienced PR and then progression, 6 patients who had no response (30%), 2 patients progressed (10%) and 1 patient who experienced a mixed response (5%).

The median time to response was 91 days, the duration of response was 48 days, and the median time to progression after a response was 28 days. Among the 3 patients who did not respond to ruxolitinib or belumosudil monotherapy, the combination therapy led to1 patient showing a CR and 2 patients showing a PR. There were 5 patients (25%) who discontinued treatment after a median of 125 days and all other immunosuppressive agents were either tapered or discontinued in all patients that had a response to the combination.

According to response by organ system, there were 7 organ types addressed: upper gastrointestinal (10% of patients had CR), liver (15% of patients had CR), lung (5% had CR, 15% each had either PR or progression), musculoskeletal (5% each had either PR or progression), ocular (5% each had either CR, PR, or progression), oral (10% each had either CR or progression and 15% had PR), skin (5% each had either CR or PR).

Patients included in the analysis had previously undergone allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, developed GVHD, and received the ruxolitinib and belumosudil combination between February 1, 2022, and August 30, 2023. Eligible patients could have any disease or transplant type and the effects of the combination therapy were monitored for up to 12 months from initiation.

The majority of patients were female (60%) with either had myeloablative (65%) or reduced intensity (35%) conditioning regimens. Patients received either tacrolimus (Prograf) and methotrexate (MTX) (90%) or tacrolimus, MTX, and anti-thymocyte globulin (10%). The graft source received was either peripheral blood (95%) or bone marrow (5%) and the donor type was either matched but unrelated (75%) or related to the patient (25%).

The overall chronic GVHD (cGVHD) grade at diagnosis was either mild (45%), moderate (40%), or severe (15%), and the cGVHD at the onset of the combination was also mild (10%), moderate (25%), or severe (65%). For the best response cGVHD grade 10% of patients had mild best response, 30% had moderate, 55% had severe, and 5% had CR.

Regarding adverse events (AEs), there were no patients who had or developed cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, graft failure, or relapse disease, and there was no worsening of cytopenia.

However, 4 patients (20%) developed pneumonia and 2 developed (10%) an upper respiratory infection. Belumosudil was decreased in 1 patient because of AEs not mentioned in the poster but then tolerated at the decreased dose, and 1 patient died while receiving the combination therapy.

Historically, ruxolitinib and belumosudil monotherapy has an ORR of 76% and 65%, respectively.2,3 Other commonly used treatments have a lower response rate of 26%, as shown in the REACH3 study (NCT03112603).4 Both ruxolitinib and belumosudil are well-tolerated medications with different primary targets: ruxolitinib targets the JAK/Stat pathway, whereas belumosudil targets ROCK2.2

“Possible synergistic effects of combination therapy, targeting GVHD from multiple inflammatory pathways may yield higher response rates [and] possible underlying changes in the pathophysiology and manifestations of chronic GVHD over time, [which] could support re-introducing previously failed therapies for use in combination with other agents,” investigators hypothesized.

Moving forward, “large scale studies [are] warranted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and durability of response to combination therapy, though there may be overlapping downstream effects of STAT3 and STAT5,” they noted.

References

  1. Caputo J, Peddireddi A, Bhatta S, et al. Combination ruxolitinib and belumosudil is tolerable and induces responses despite treatment failure as monotherapies. Presented at: 2024 Transplantation and Cellular Therapies Meeting; February 21 to 24, 2024; San Antonio, TX. Abstract 382.
  2. Cutler C, Lee SJ, Arai S, et al. Belumosudil for chronic graft-versus-host disease after 2 or more prior lines of therapy: the ROCKstarstudy. Blood. 2021;138(22):2278-2289. doi:10.1182/blood.2021012021
  3. Zeiser R, Polverelli N, Ram R, et al. Ruxolitinib for glucocorticoid-refractory chronic graft versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(3):228-238. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2033122
  4. Zeiser R, Polverelli N, Ram R, et al. Ruxolitinib for glucocorticoid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(3):228-238. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2033122
Recent Videos
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Data from the REVEAL study affirm elevated white blood cell counts and higher variant allele frequency as risk factors for progression in polycythemia vera.
Additional analyses of patient-reported outcomes and MRD status in the QuANTUM-First trial are also ongoing, says Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD.
Related Content