Social media can help physicians recruit for clinical trials, according to the findings of a study1 published in JAMA Network Open. But the study found many barriers remain for effective trial recruitment
“While social media is a promising method of communicating clinical trial information to large and diverse populations, the idea of using social media for recruitment purposes poses challenges owing to physician concerns about increased administrative burden and the risk of misinformation,” wrote Mina S. Sedrak, MD, MS, of City of Hope Duarte, Calif., and colleagues.
Researchers interviewed 44 physicians at the main academic site and 6 affiliated community sites of City of Hope in-person or by telephone for the qualitative study. All interviews were conducted between March and June 2018. An interview guide was used to explore perceptions of social media use for accrual of cancer therapeutic trials. Of the participants, 36% were women and the majority (68%) had more than 10 years of practice experience. Twenty-four of the participants were academic-based and 20 were community-based.
Data from the study was found using qualitative content analysis. Researchers found less than 5% of patients of the physicians interviewed were enrolled in clinical trials. Three themes were identified as potential advantages of social media use for trial recruitment. First, social media provides increased visibility and awareness. Second, social media improves communication, and third, social media provides a method of patient engagement. Physicians recognized that social media allowed them “to reach large populations and easily spread information about available trials”.
“Our findings revealed that physicians are not currently comfortable with or prepared to effectively use social media for cancer clinical trial recruitment,” the researchers wrote. “Although there are some aspects of these new modes of communication that physicians are enthusiastic about (ie, increased visibility and awareness), several important concerns remain.”
Among those concerns, the physicians described several disadvantages of social media, including increased administrative burden, risk of misinformation, a lack of guidance on how best to engage, and limited outreach to all available participants.
The physicians were asked for some potential strategies for more effective use of social media for trial recruitment. Among common themes discussed were increased institutional support, including resources to manage recruitment efforts on social media. Participants also suggested ways to learn the benefit of social media and training in how to effectively use social media platforms.
“Additional research is needed to further examine and better understand the risks and benefits of using social media for clinical trial recruitment, better characterize physicians’ concerns among larger cohorts, and identify methods to optimize social media use in clinical trials,” the researcher wrote. “Importantly, the use of social media for clinical recruitment has potential implications in promoting the engagement of otherwise underrepresented groups.”
Disclosures:
Sedrak, M., Sun, V., Liu, J., George, K., Wong, A., Dale, W. and Dizon, D. (2019). Physician Perceptions of the Use of Social Media for Recruitment of Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials. [online] JAMA Network Open. Available at: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2751392?widget=personalizedcontent&previousarticle=0 [Accessed 8 Oct. 2019].
Social Media Recruiting for Trials Falls Short
A survey of physicians found recruiting for trials through social media can be useful, but not for cancer therapeutic trials.
Social media can help physicians recruit for clinical trials, according to the findings of a study1 published in JAMA Network Open. But the study found many barriers remain for effective trial recruitment
“While social media is a promising method of communicating clinical trial information to large and diverse populations, the idea of using social media for recruitment purposes poses challenges owing to physician concerns about increased administrative burden and the risk of misinformation,” wrote Mina S. Sedrak, MD, MS, of City of Hope Duarte, Calif., and colleagues.
Researchers interviewed 44 physicians at the main academic site and 6 affiliated community sites of City of Hope in-person or by telephone for the qualitative study. All interviews were conducted between March and June 2018. An interview guide was used to explore perceptions of social media use for accrual of cancer therapeutic trials. Of the participants, 36% were women and the majority (68%) had more than 10 years of practice experience. Twenty-four of the participants were academic-based and 20 were community-based.
Data from the study was found using qualitative content analysis. Researchers found less than 5% of patients of the physicians interviewed were enrolled in clinical trials. Three themes were identified as potential advantages of social media use for trial recruitment. First, social media provides increased visibility and awareness. Second, social media improves communication, and third, social media provides a method of patient engagement. Physicians recognized that social media allowed them “to reach large populations and easily spread information about available trials”.
“Our findings revealed that physicians are not currently comfortable with or prepared to effectively use social media for cancer clinical trial recruitment,” the researchers wrote. “Although there are some aspects of these new modes of communication that physicians are enthusiastic about (ie, increased visibility and awareness), several important concerns remain.”
Among those concerns, the physicians described several disadvantages of social media, including increased administrative burden, risk of misinformation, a lack of guidance on how best to engage, and limited outreach to all available participants.
The physicians were asked for some potential strategies for more effective use of social media for trial recruitment. Among common themes discussed were increased institutional support, including resources to manage recruitment efforts on social media. Participants also suggested ways to learn the benefit of social media and training in how to effectively use social media platforms.
“Additional research is needed to further examine and better understand the risks and benefits of using social media for clinical trial recruitment, better characterize physicians’ concerns among larger cohorts, and identify methods to optimize social media use in clinical trials,” the researcher wrote. “Importantly, the use of social media for clinical recruitment has potential implications in promoting the engagement of otherwise underrepresented groups.”
Disclosures:
Sedrak, M., Sun, V., Liu, J., George, K., Wong, A., Dale, W. and Dizon, D. (2019). Physician Perceptions of the Use of Social Media for Recruitment of Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials. [online] JAMA Network Open. Available at: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2751392?widget=personalizedcontent&previousarticle=0 [Accessed 8 Oct. 2019].
Newsletter
Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.
Ibrilatazar Shows Survival Improvement in Advanced Squamous NSCLC
Following the induction phase with chemotherapy alone, ibrilatazar has shown a manageable toxicity profile in patients with advanced squamous NSCLC.
Sharpening the Prostate Cancer Toolkit: Practical Insights on PSMA Imaging
Experts weigh in on the practical applications of PSMA PET imaging
Twice Daily, Hyperfractionated Thoracic Radiotherapy Effective at 60 Gy in SCLC
A phase 2 trial demonstrated a median overall survival of 43.5 months at 60 Gy compared with 22.5 months at 45 Gy in patients with limited-stage SCLC.
Exploring Burnout Causes and Management in Oncologic Practice
Professor of pharmacology Eric Winer, MD, spoke about a publication he authored exploring the state of oncologist burnout and how it impacts practice.
THIO Plus Cemiplimab Associated with Prolonged OS in ICI-Resistant NSCLC
THIO with cemiplimab is active and well-tolerated in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors in second- and third-line settings.
High Responses With BNT327/PM8002 Plus Chemo in Mesothelioma
Frontline BNT327/PM8002 plus chemotherapy led to a confirmed ORR of 51.6% and a DCR of 90.3% in patients with unresectable pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma.
Ibrilatazar Shows Survival Improvement in Advanced Squamous NSCLC
Following the induction phase with chemotherapy alone, ibrilatazar has shown a manageable toxicity profile in patients with advanced squamous NSCLC.
Sharpening the Prostate Cancer Toolkit: Practical Insights on PSMA Imaging
Experts weigh in on the practical applications of PSMA PET imaging
Twice Daily, Hyperfractionated Thoracic Radiotherapy Effective at 60 Gy in SCLC
A phase 2 trial demonstrated a median overall survival of 43.5 months at 60 Gy compared with 22.5 months at 45 Gy in patients with limited-stage SCLC.
Exploring Burnout Causes and Management in Oncologic Practice
Professor of pharmacology Eric Winer, MD, spoke about a publication he authored exploring the state of oncologist burnout and how it impacts practice.
THIO Plus Cemiplimab Associated with Prolonged OS in ICI-Resistant NSCLC
THIO with cemiplimab is active and well-tolerated in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors in second- and third-line settings.
High Responses With BNT327/PM8002 Plus Chemo in Mesothelioma
Frontline BNT327/PM8002 plus chemotherapy led to a confirmed ORR of 51.6% and a DCR of 90.3% in patients with unresectable pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma.