Sutent Gets Regular FDA Approval for RCC

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 16 No 3
Volume 16
Issue 3

FDA officials have granted regular approval to Sutent (sunitinib malate, Pfizer) for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who failed prior cytokine-based therapy, upgrading it from the accelerated approval granted in January 2006.

ROCKVILLE, Maryland—FDA officials have granted regular approval to Sutent (sunitinib malate, Pfizer) for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who failed prior cytokine-based therapy, upgrading it from the accelerated approval granted in January 2006. The new labeling also includes the first-line use of Sutent for treating advanced RCC.

The agency gave the drug, an oral multikinase inhibitor, initial marketing approval for two indications simultaneously last year—advanced RCC and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Sutent received its RCC approval on the basis of partial-response and response-duration rates obtained in two single-arm, multicenter clinical studies. FDA based its decision to upgrade Sutent's approval status on an interim analysis of a large phase III trial showing clinical benefit in patients treated with the drug (N Engl J Med 356:115-124, 2007).

The trial randomized 750 treatment-naive metastatic RCC patients to Sutent or interferon-alfa. Sutent-treated patients had significantly longer median progression-free survival: 11 months vs 5 months for interferon (HR 0.42). The Sutent group had a 27.5% response rate vs 5.3% for IFN. Overall survival data have not reached maturity.

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Related Content