TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 38-39

TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)

TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)

Background

Emerging evidence indicates that homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) contributes to resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus endocrine therapy (ET). Patients with germline or somatic mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and/or PALB2 genes (BRCA1 mutation/BRCA2 mutation/PALB2 mutation) and hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) advanced breast cancer have poorer outcomes with first-line standard-of-care CDK4/6i plus ET than patients without these mutations. Clinical benefit with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) has been demonstrated in patients with HRD breast cancer, and PARPi are approved for the treatment of patients with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations and HR+ /HER2– early or advanced breast cancer. Clinical trials have shown that PARPi use in early lines of therapy can result in a greater magnitude of benefit. PARPi use may also induce reversion mutations that restore homologous recombination proficiency, potentially sensitizing tumors to CDK4/6i. Saruparib (AZD5305) is a first-in-class highly selective PARP1 inhibitor that has increased potency and improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with other approved PARPi. The phase 3 EvoPAR-Breast01 study (NCT06380751) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of saruparib plus camizestrant, a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) and pure estrogen receptor antagonist, vs physician’s choice of CDK4/6i plus ET or CDK4/6i plus camizestrant in participants with germline/somatic BRCA1 mutation/BRCA2 mutation/PALB2 mutation HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

EvoPAR-Breast01 is a randomized, open-label, 3-arm, multicenter, global study. Study design and eligibility criteria are shown in the Figure. Participants will be randomized 2:2:1 to receive saruparib plus camizestrant, physician’s choice CDK4/6i (abemaciclib, ribociclib, or palbociclib) plus physician’s choice ET (fulvestrant, letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane), or physician’s choice CDK4/6i plus camizestrant, respectively. Treatment will continue until disease progression per RECIST v1.1, unacceptable toxicity, or participant-initiated withdrawal. The primary end point is progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent review committee in the saruparib plus camizestrant vs CDK4/6i plus ET arms. Overall survival (OS) is a secondary end point. Planned statistical analyses of PFS and OS will be conducted using a stratified log-rank test.

Status

Participant enrollment is ongoing across 185 trial locations in 20 countries. Approximately 500 participants will be randomized across the 3 arms.

Articles in this issue

55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Clinical trials conducted in recent years demonstrate the benefit of integrative oncology for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Related Content