TTFields Combo Prolongs Time to Progression in NSCLC Brain Metastasis Group

News
Article

Phase 3 data also show an improvement in deterioration-free survival with TTFields and best supportive care in those with NSCLC and brain metastases.

"The primary end point was met, significantly prolonging the time to first intracranial progression by 10.6 months…In addition, TTFields therapy also added to best supportive care following stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of improved deterioration-free survival, a measure of quality-of-life, and was well-tolerated,” said Minesh Mehta, MD.

"The primary end point was met, significantly prolonging the time to first intracranial progression by 10.6 months…In addition, TTFields therapy also added to best supportive care following stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of improved deterioration-free survival, a measure of quality-of-life, and was well-tolerated,” said Minesh Mehta, MD.

The median time to intracranial progression was prolonged by more than 10 months with the addition of tumor treating fields (TTFields) to best supportive care (BSC) among those with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases, according to data from the phase 3 METIS trial (NCT02831959) presented during the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.1,2

Data showed that the median time to intracranial progression was 21.9 months vs 11.3 months, respectively, with the addition of TTFields to BSC vs BSC alone, translating to a statistically significant reduction in risk of 33% (HR, 0.67; P =.0158).

Patients treated with TTFields therapy also had an extended quality-of-life (QOL) deterioration-free survival. The median time to QOL deterioration-free survival was not reached in the TTFields vs 7.7 months in the control arm of BSC alone (P =.038).

The researchers also observed that the addition of TTFields to BSC led to significant improvements in the majority of scales and items assessed by the EORTC QLQ core questionnaire and BN20 patient questionnaires. Importantly, there was no evidence of cognitive decline in the TTFields therapy group compared with the control arm, suggesting that this treatment not only is beneficial, but also preserves cognitive function.

“The primary end point was met, significantly prolonging the time to first intracranial progression by 10.6 months…In addition, TTFields therapy also added to best supportive care following stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of improved deterioration-free survival, a measure of quality-of-life, and was well-tolerated,” said Minesh Mehta, MD, chief of radiation oncology and deputy director at Miami Cancer Institute, part of Baptist Health South Florida, during a presentation of the data at the ASCO annual meeting.

In the phase 3 METIS trial, 298 adult patients with 1-10 brain metastases from NSCLC were randomized following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and treated with either TTFields therapy and BSC (n = 149) or BSC alone (n = 149). Supportive care consisted of a range of interventions, including corticosteroids, anti-epileptics, anticoagulants, and medications for pain or nausea management.

Patients in both study arms were eligible for systemic therapy for their NSCLC at the discretion of their treating physician. Enrollment was open to patients with Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70, those who were newly diagnosed with 1 inoperable or 2-10 supra/infratentorial brain metastases suitable for SRS, and those receiving optimal extracranial disease therapy. However, patients with known tumor mutations for which targeted agents are available were not eligible for enrollment in the trial.

Patients were stratified by the number of brain metastases (1-4 or 5-10), prior systemic therapy, and tumor histology, and crossover to the TTFields arm was allowed after confirmation of second intracranial progression.

"The study was conducted at 78 sites that enrolled patients. Two hundred and ninety-eight patients were randomized. The study was conducted between October 2016 and March 2023. The cutoff date for these data is December 5, 2023,” added Mehta.

The median duration of TTFields therapy was 16 weeks (range, 0.1-193.1) and the median usage was 67% (range, 0.8-96.7), which was similar to what has previously been demonstrated in studies of TTFields. Baseline patient demographics and characteristics were well balanced between arms with the median age being 63.5 (range, 37-84) years, 37.6% of patients being female, most having a KPS ≥ 80 (38.6%), and 76.8% of patients having adenocarcinoma.

In addition to the primary end point of time to first intracranial progression, as measured from the date of first SRS treatment to intracranial progression or neurological death, whichever occurs first, investigators assessed the secondary end points of time to distant progression, time to neurocognitive failure, overall survival (OS), time to second intracranial progression, QOL and adverse events (AEs).

A preliminary analysis of key secondary end points did not show statistical significance. For patients given TTFields therapy with BSC, the median OS was 11.3 months (95% CI, 8.5-13.5) compared with 10.6 months (95% CI, 6.8-14.1) in patients treated with BSC alone (P = .78). Full analysis of secondary end points, including time to neurocognitive failure, OS, and radiological response rate, is ongoing and will be reported at a later date.

For safety, 66 (52%) of the patients treated with TTFields had any-grade device-related AEs, most of which were skin-related. While the majority were grades 1 and 2, there were 3 (2.4%) patients who had grade ≥3 device-related AEs, 1 of which was grade 5 (seizures/tumor progression). Fifteen patients crossed over to receive TTFields therapy and of these patients, 1 had a device-related grade 3 AE, which was headache.

Moreover, the incidence of grade ≥3 serious AEs was comparable between the treatment arms at 63 patients (49.6%) in the TTFields arm vs 87 patients (54.4%) in the BSC alone arm.

“Please note that these are only the topline results and remaining detailed analysis for the rest of the data are ongoing. Based on these data, consideration should be given to TTFields as a potential adjunctive treatment to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with non–small cell lung cancer without targetable oncogenic driver mutations,” concluded Mehta.

References

  1. Mehta MP, Gondi V, Ahluwalia MS, et al. Results from METIS (EF-25), an international, multicenter phase III randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy in NSCLC patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42 (suppl 16;abstr 2008). doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.2008
  2. METIS phase 3 clinical trial met primary endpoint significantly delaying time to intracranial progression with improved quality of life deterioration-free survival. News release. Novocure. June 3, 2024. Accessed June 3, 2024. https://tinyurl.com/bddrpkjd
Recent Videos
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Data from the REVEAL study affirm elevated white blood cell counts and higher variant allele frequency as risk factors for progression in polycythemia vera.
Additional analyses of patient-reported outcomes and MRD status in the QuANTUM-First trial are also ongoing, says Harry P. Erba, MD, PhD.
Related Content