Virtual Colonoscopy Screening More Cost-Effective

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 16 No 5
Volume 16
Issue 5

A new study has determined that virtual colonoscopy that ignores lesions smaller than 6 mm provides the most cost-effective screening tool for colorectal cancer.

MADISON, Wisconsin—A new study has determined that virtual colonoscopy that ignores lesions smaller than 6 mm provides the most cost-effective screening tool for colorectal cancer. Modeling of 100,000 men and women age 50 and older at average risk for the disease showed that follow-up of virtual colonoscopy with optical colonoscopy for lesions of 6 mm or larger cost $4,361 per life-year gained vs $9,180 for optical colonoscopy. The costs for virtual colonoscopy with no size limitation and sigmoidoscopy were $7,138 and $7,407, respectively. The study will be published in the June 1 issue of Cancer, following earlier publication on-line (DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22868).

Perry J. Pickhardt, MD, of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and colleagues projected a hypothetical model that predicted 2,940 cases of colorectal cancer in a simulated population of 100,000 adults if no screening were performed.

At baseline conditions, all three screening tests proved cost-effective, compared with no screening. Using virtual colonoscopy resulted in a 77.6% reduction in invasive endoscopic procedures and a 76% reduction in complications related to optical colonoscopy.

The authors concluded that virtual colonoscopy "was the most cost-effective and safest screening option evaluated." They also found that "the removal of diminutive lesions appears to carry an unjustified burden of costs and complications relative to the minimal gain in clinical efficacy."

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Treatment with KRAS inhibitors may help mitigate a common driver of genetic alteration across a majority of pancreatic cancers.
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Combining sotorasib with panitumumab may reduce the burden of disease in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Findings from the CodeBreak 300 study have cemented sotorasib/panitumumab as a third-line treatment option for KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Sotorasib plus panitumumab may offer improved survival compared with previously approved treatment options in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Additional local, regional, or national policy may bolster access to screening for colorectal cancer, according to Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH.
Related Content