Latest News

Chemoimmunotherapy Enhanced Survival vs Chemo Alone in ES-SCLC
Chemoimmunotherapy Enhanced Survival vs Chemo Alone in ES-SCLC

April 27th 2025

Patients with ES-SCLC who received immunotherapy plus chemotherapy experienced a median OS of 14.9 months vs 11.9 months with chemotherapy alone.

Findings from a multicenter cohort study support screening adherence as a key lung cancer screening quality metric.
Lung Cancer Screening Adherence Decreases Across Subsequent Testing

April 24th 2025

A systematic review shows that well-designed randomized clinical trials are necessary to optimize treatment strategies with tislelizumab in lung cancer.
Tislelizumab Significantly Boosts Survival in Lung Cancer Trials

April 23rd 2025

“These results and the lack of systemic toxicity observed with [TTFields] provide patients with a promising new treatment option,” according to Joachim Aerts, MD, an investigator of the phase 3 LUNAR trial (NCT02973789).
TTFields Therapy Earns EU Approval in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

April 23rd 2025

Ivonescimab/Chemo Prolongs PFS in 1L Advanced Squamous NSCLC
Ivonescimab/Chemo Prolongs PFS in 1L Advanced Squamous NSCLC

April 23rd 2025

More News


Site Logo

Second-Line Treatment of Small-Cell Lung Cancer

February 1st 2003

Small-cell lung cancer is an aggressive tumor associated with highrates of regional or distant metastases at diagnosis. Although highlychemosensitive to agents given in the first-line setting (eg, etoposideand cisplatin), most patients relapse and have a poor prognosis.Treatment options for relapsed patients include radiotherapy forlimited-stage disease and chemotherapy or combined modalities foradvanced-stage disease. In clinical practice, however, some oncologistsmaintain that chemotherapy provides an insufficient survivalbenefit to justify the sometimes debilitating toxicity associated with themore active regimens in particular. Other potential barriers to furthertreatment include patient comorbidities, performance status, site(s) ofprogression, progression-free interval, and previous treatments. However,numerous clinical trials demonstrate that some patients benefitfrom treatment, achieving prolonged survival, symptom palliation,improved quality of life, and the opportunity, albeit rare, for durableremission. Additionally, several novel chemotherapeutics are availablethat alone or in combination help patients lead an improvedquality of life. Finally, alternative routes and schedules-oral formulations,weekly administration, and prolonged treatment vacations-have been developed to deliver chemotherapy to patients with poorperformance status or multiple comorbidities. This article reviews theadvantages and disadvantages of treating recurrent small-cell lungcancer and summarizes the utility of several active agents.


Site Logo

Current Role of Irinotecan in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

September 1st 2002

Lung cancer remains the primary cause of cancer-related death in both men and women in the United States. Chemotherapy has been shown to provide a survival benefit in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and current regimens have produced median survivals of approximately 8 months and 1-year survival rates of 30% to 35% in patients with stage IIIB and IV disease. Nevertheless, there remains room for improvement. Irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). It also appears to have promising activity in advanced NSCLC, producing overall response rates of up to 32%. Combinations of irinotecan and cisplatin or carboplatin (Paraplatin) have resulted in overall response rates of 25% to 56% in phase II and III studies in patients with advanced disease, with median survivals ranging from 9 to 13 months and 1-year survival rates of 33% to 58%. Current irinotecan-based doublet and triplet regimens appear to produce promising response rates with manageable toxicities. In addition, irinotecan has demonstrated potential as a radiosensitizing agent and is currently being evaluated in several trials of combined-modality therapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Early trials of irinotecan in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin along with radiation therapy have reported overall response rates of 60% to 67%. The approach appears to have potential and warrants further study. [ONCOLOGY 16:1153-1168, 2002]