106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 44-45

106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)

106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)

Background

Despite modern HER2-directed treatment options, relevant recurrence risk persists in patients with extensive local disease and/or lack of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy. Neratinib is approved in Europe for extended adjuvant therapy in adult patients with HER2-positive (HER2+)/hormone receptor–positive (HR+) early breast cancer who completed adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy less than 1 year ago. In this population, the phase 3 ExteNET study (NCT00878709) demonstrated an absolute 5.1% improvement in 5-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with neratinib compared with placebo (90.8% vs 85.7%; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82). Exploratory post hoc analyses demonstrated a more pronounced benefit in patients who don’t have a pCR and/or in those completing neratinib therapy. Diarrhea was the most common adverse effect (AE) in the neratinib arm (39% grade 3 without primary diarrhea prophylaxis). ELEANOR (NCT04388384) is the first noninterventional study of the real-world use and management of neratinib given after the current adjuvant standard of care in patients with HER2+/HR+ early breast cancer in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Materials and Methods

A total of 300 patients diagnosed with HER2+/HR+ early breast cancer were planned to be enrolled in accordance with the European Medicines Agency/Swissmedic product specifications. The primary objective is to assess patient adherence to neratinib (ie, ≥ 75% of prescribed treatment days). Secondary objectives focus on patient and tumor characteristics, pretreatment and neratinib treatment details, effectiveness, safety, and health-related quality of life. Results of the preplanned interim analysis based on 300 enrolled patients observed for a minimum of 3 months are reported.

Results

At the data cut-off on August 5, 2023, 286 patients qualified for the main analysis set and 288 patients for the safety analysis set, respectively. Median age at inclusion was 52.0 years, 73.4% (210/286) of patients were at increased risk of disease recurrence having AJCC stage I or higher or N+ or non-pCR after neoadjuvant treatment. Overall, 37.4% (107/286) and 31.8% (91/286) of patients received adjuvant/post-neoadjuvant trastuzumab monotherapy or trastuzumab/pertuzumab, respectively, and 22.4% (64/286) of patients received post-neoadjuvant trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). In patients who had non-pCR following neoadjuvant treatment, 55.4% (62/112) received post-neoadjuvant T-DM1. Dose escalation strategy (neratinib starting dose < 240 mg) was used in 44.4% (128/288) of patients, and 86.8% (250/288) of patients received diarrhea prophylaxis. AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of neratinib with incidence of grade 3 or higher diarrhea by worst grade less common in patients starting on a lower dose of neratinib (15.6% vs 23.8%). At the time of this preplanned interim analysis with an estimated median observation time for disease-free survival of 14.0 months, 6 patients (6/286, 2.1%) had experienced a relapse and one patient died since starting neratinib treatment, resulting in a 12-month DFS rate of 97.4% (95% CI, 94.6-98.7).

Conclusion

This preplanned interim analysis provides data on the use of neratinib in a contemporary cohort of predominantly higher-risk patients and after completion of pertuzumab- and T-DM1-containing adjuvant regimens in routine clinical practice. Preliminary effectiveness data appears to be consistent with previous data and the integration of treatment management strategies such as diarrhea prophylaxis and neratinib dose escalation were shown to enhance treatment tolerability.

Articles in this issue

TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature
TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study
TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study
106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)
106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)
107 Neratinib-Based Combination Treatments for Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases
107 Neratinib-Based Combination Treatments for Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Findings from the OVARIO study show that patients with HRR–deficient and BRCA-mutated disease benefitted the most from niraparib/bevacizumab maintenance.
Select comorbidities, ECOG status, and the receipt of radiation were among the differences between a real-world cohort and the RUBY trial population.
Related Content