84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 81

84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

84 EQUALS: Vaginal/Sexual Health in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background/Significance

Vagina/sexual health issues are common but under-recognized and understudied in women with breast cancer being treated with endocrine therapy. The EQUALS (ELAINE ESR1 QUAlity of Life Survey) explored quality of life and symptoms, biomarkers, treatment adverse effects (AEs), and patient-medical team communication of women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Here, the vagina/sexual health aspects from 3 EQUALS were summarized.

Materials and Methods

EQUALS 1, 2, and 3 (EQ1, EQ2, EQ3) were sent to/posted for ER–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients from Cure Media Group, Facebook and Twitter groups, patient advocacy groups, authors’ contacts, and breast cancer clinic patients in June 2022 (EQ1, 42 questions), March/April 2023 (EQ2; 50 questions; mostly on vulvovaginal atrophy), and June/September 2023 (EQ3, 55 questions). Survey answers were summarized descriptively. Patients received a $10 gift card at survey completion.

Results

887 patients completed 3 EQUALS. Respondents were 19 to 83 years old; and one-third to one-half were non-White in EQ1/3, and mostly White (85%) in EQ2. Half to three quarters lived in urban/suburban settings; three-quarters had higher education. Patients had 1 to 4 treatment lines for metastatic breast cancer.

Vaginal symptoms were reported by 61% of patients and associated with breast cancer treatment for a mean of 4.8 years (EQ2). The most bothersome symptoms were vaginal dryness (33%), painful intercourse (14%), and vaginal itching (10%). AEs impacting quality of life were vaginal atrophy/dryness (36% to 47%) in EQ1/3, and sexual dysfunction (45%) in EQ3.

Sexual intimacy worried 64% of patients in EQ1; vaginal/sexual AEs concerned 80% in EQ2; and sexual dysfunction concerned 27% in EQ3. More than half (60%) of patients said metastatic breast cancer or its treatment negatively impacted intimate/sexual relationships in EQ1. In EQ2, vaginal/sexual AEs negatively impacted sexual intercourse frequency (61%) and self-esteem (64%), and made 51% feel isolated. Commonly reported effects of vaginal/sexual AEs were limited enjoyment of sexual activity (39%), painful intercourse (33%), and vaginal burning/itching (32%). Half (54%) of patients never/almost never felt sexual desire/interest in the past month, especially when prior endocrine therapy negatively impacted their sexual health (61%); low sexual desire bothered 56%.

In EQ1/2, 31% to 61% of patients were uncomfortable discussing vaginal/sexual AEs with their medical team. In EQ2, approximately one-third felt poorly informed by their medical team (38%) and poorly equipped to improve these AEs (33%). More patients in EQ1/2 were comfortable discussing these AEs, and in EQ2, more felt well informed by their medical team, if their oncologist was female.

Most (93%, EQ2) were interested in an FDA-approved, well-tolerated, breast cancer treatment that improved vaginal/sexual health.

Conclusion

Women treated for ER–positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer experienced and were concerned about vaginal/sexual AEs, which negatively impacted their intimate/sexual relationships. Many were uncomfortable discussing these symptoms with their medical team and felt poorly informed/equipped to manage them.

Articles in this issue

55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Clinical trials conducted in recent years demonstrate the benefit of integrative oncology for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Related Content