96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 39-40

96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

Background

Endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is the standard-of-care (SOC) for first-line estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2–) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Sequential ET monotherapy or combinations are used second line post-ET plus CDK4/6i. Combination regimens in second-line or late metastatic breast cancer can be associated with significant toxicities and high discontinuation rates. ESR1 mutations, a type of acquired resistance, eventually emerge in up to 50% of patients after first-line treatment for ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial (NCT03778931), patients with ESR1-mutated tumors had a 45% reduction in risk of progression or death with elacestrant vs SOC ET (median progression-free survival [PFS] 3.8 months vs 1.9 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P = .0005). In patients with 12 months or more prior ET plus CDK4/6i, the median PFS with elacestrant was 8.6 months vs 1.9 months with SOC ET (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63). Elacestrant was FDA-approved in January 2023 for the treatment of postmenopausal ER+/HER2– ESR1-mutated metastatic breast cancer with progression after at least one line of ET. Sufficient time has passed since approval to characterize the real-world use of elacestrant in the current treatment landscape. This study aims to describe the real-world PFS of elacestrant overall and in patients with no prior exposure to fulvestrant, only 1 to 2 lines of ET, 3 or more lines of ET, and/or visceral metastases.

Materials and Methods

Adults with diagnosed ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer who initiated elacestrant in a real-world setting between January 2023 and May 2024 were identified in the Komodo Research Database. Demographic information described at index date (time of first administration of elacestrant) included metastatic sites identified during the 6-month baseline period prior to index date and prior metastatic breast cancer treatments. Real-world PFS was defined as time from index date until earliest outcome (start of next line of metastatic breast cancer therapy to progression or death). Patients were censored at first occurrence of end of data availability or end of health plan enrollment.

Results

A total of 276 patients treated were evaluated (median age 63 years, 86% visceral metastases, 90% prior CDK4/6i, 61% prior fulvestrant). Real-world PFS was prolonged with elacestrant in patients with prior fulvestrant and in the overall population in all subgroups (Table).

Table. Real-World Median Progression-Free Survival

Table. Real-World Median Progression-Free Survival

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, elacestrant showed a consistent real-world PFS benefit among all patients with ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer and across clinically relevant subgroups. The real-world PFS with elacestrant exceeded the overall median PFS in EMERALD and is longer when patients are treated in earlier lines.

Articles in this issue

55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Clinical trials conducted in recent years demonstrate the benefit of integrative oncology for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Related Content