Benjamin Cooper, MD, Examines Rationale Behind Combining TAK-676 With Pembrolizumab After Radiation in Select Solid Tumors

Video

Benjamin Cooper, MD, discussed an ongoing trial examining TAK-676 in combination with pembrolizumab after radiation therapy for patients with non–small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, and triple-negative breast cancer.

At the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Benjamin Cooper, MD, a radiation oncologist and director of Proton Therapy Services at NYU Langone Health, about a phase 1 trial in progress (NCT04879849) which is analyzing TAK-676 plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) after radiation for patients with non–small cell lung, triple-negative breast, and squamous cell head and neck cancer that has progressed following checkpoint inhibitor therapy. He also discussed the mechanism of action of TAK-676 and dosing regimens for these patients.

Transcript:

TAK-676 is a sting agonist that is delivered intravenously. The idea [behind] combining it with pembrolizumab is to reinvigorate the immune system. We’re adding radiation in addition to that at 8 Gy times 3 to generate neoantigens to helpfully allow a systemic response.

This is a phase 1 trial looking at patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, and non–small cell lung cancer. These patients all have progressed on checkpoint inhibition, and this is a phase 1 dose-escalation trial of the TAK-676 molecule. Patients are enrolled after a positive biopsy; they are treated with 8 Gy times 3 to up to 3 sites with the intention of generating new antigens. Over 40 hours later, they’re treated with the checkpoint [inhibitor] pembrolizumab, as well as with TAK-676 and are assessed in 3 weeks cycles.

Reference

Cooper BT, Chmura SJ, Luke JJ, et al. TAK-676 in combination with pembrolizumab after radiation therapy in patients (pts) with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), or squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): Phase 1 study design. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 17): TPS2698. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.TPS2698

Related Videos
Cancer vaccines are a “cross-cutting approach” that may be applicable across several cancer types, according to Catherine J. Wu, MD.
mRNA may be a potential modality for developing cancer-based vaccines, according to Catherine J. Wu, MD.
Analyzing the KRAS mutation across various cancer types may be a worthwhile target when using a cancer vaccine or immunotherapy, says Catherine J. Wu, MD.
The AACR Health Disparities Report highlights the changes needed to achieve health equity for patients with cancer.
Robert A. Winn, MD, gives insight into how institutions and community practices can improve access to cancer care.
In the October edition of Snap Recap, we review the latest FDA news and the vote from the last ODAC meeting.
In this September edition of Snap Recap, we share our highlights from Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, news in the breast cancer space, and the latest FDA updates.
Implementing tax benefits for manufacturers who produce chemotherapy drugs may be one solution to increase drug production in the United States, according to Lucio N. Gordan, MD.
Lucio N. Gordan, MD, describes how his practice deals with increasing costs of limited chemotherapy agents to ensure that patients with cancer continue to receive treatment.
Related Content