Cancer Diagnosis Associated With Increased Risk of Adverse Financial Events

Article

Patients with cancer are at a higher risk for adverse financial effects compared with those who have not been diagnosed.

Adverse financial effects (AFEs) and past-due credit card payments were found to be more prevalent in patients who have received a cancer diagnosis, although more information is needed to determine how this relate to treatment decisions and quality of life, according to a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

When age, sex, average baseline credit, area deprivation index, and diagnosis year was adjusted, patients with cancer had a higher risk of AFEs (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.61-1.81; P <.0001), as well as past-due credit payments (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19-1.37; P <.0001) compared with those in the control group.

A total of 190,722 patients were identified from either Western Washington SEER cancer registry and included 63,574 cases and a random sample of voter registry records known as controls of 127,148.

More patients in the cases group had an unknown area deprivation index compared with the control group. Notably, the distribution of cases and controls across different area deprivation index categories was similar, although a small proportion of individuals in both groups resided in high area deprivation index neighborhoods. A lower baseline of available credit was observed in the cases group, with an average mean credit line of $12,486. In total, 13.8% of patients were Black.

At 24 months, there was evidence of more AFEs (4.3% vs 2.4%; P <.0001) and higher rates of past-due credit card payments (2.6% vs 1.9%; P <.0001) in the cases group compared with the control group. Additionally, more patients who were Black experienced AFEs than those who were not (15.2% vs 4.2%; P <.0001) in the cases vs controls group, respectively.

The most common AFEs were third-party collections, charge-offs, and delinquent mortgage payments. However, foreclosures and repossessions were less common. In the cases group, all events were more common, with the exception of foreclosures and liens which were uncommon and not significantly higher in the cancer population.

Patients who had received a cancer diagnosis were associated with all AFE severity types following adjustment, including severe AFE (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.76-1.99), more severe AFE (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.40), and most severe AFE (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.04-2.02). A subgroup consisting of 5-year cancer survivors with matched controls showed a greater proportion of both groups experienced AFE, but those with cancer remained at an increased risk at 9.0% and 6.1% in the control group (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.32-1.50; P <.0001).

The sensitivity analysis found the mean number of prior AFEs was 0.26 in the cases group compared with 0.16 in the control group. Patients in the cases group had a lower baseline available credit of $9,716 vs $11,136 in the control group (P <.0001).

Additionally, a separate analysis was conducted that included patients who died within 24 months of diagnosis. The analysis found that 5.3% of patients with cancer had AFEs post-diagnosis compared with 4.3% of those with cancer who survived after 24 months. The logistic regression analysis found those with cancer had an increased risk of AFEs compared with those in the controls (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 2.1-2.3; P <.0001).

Reference

Shankaran V, Li L, Fedorenko C, et al. Risk of adverse financial events in patients with cancer: evidence from a novel linkage between cancer registry and credit records. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(8):884-891. doi:10.1200/JCO.21.01636

Related Videos
Cancer vaccines are a “cross-cutting approach” that may be applicable across several cancer types, according to Catherine J. Wu, MD.
mRNA may be a potential modality for developing cancer-based vaccines, according to Catherine J. Wu, MD.
Analyzing the KRAS mutation across various cancer types may be a worthwhile target when using a cancer vaccine or immunotherapy, says Catherine J. Wu, MD.
The AACR Health Disparities Report highlights the changes needed to achieve health equity for patients with cancer.
Robert A. Winn, MD, gives insight into how institutions and community practices can improve access to cancer care.
In the October edition of Snap Recap, we review the latest FDA news and the vote from the last ODAC meeting.
In this September edition of Snap Recap, we share our highlights from Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, news in the breast cancer space, and the latest FDA updates.
Implementing tax benefits for manufacturers who produce chemotherapy drugs may be one solution to increase drug production in the United States, according to Lucio N. Gordan, MD.
Lucio N. Gordan, MD, describes how his practice deals with increasing costs of limited chemotherapy agents to ensure that patients with cancer continue to receive treatment.
Related Content