Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe

Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!

scout
Advertisement

Chemo Effects May Outweigh Obesity-Related GI Alterations in Breast Cancer

April 11, 2025
By Roman Fabbricatore
Fact checked by Russ Conroy
News
Article
Conference|Oncology Nursing Society’s Annual Meeting (ONS)

Identifying biologic mechanisms driving symptoms may be necessary to develop therapies that reduce symptom burden for patients with breast cancer.

Findings from the presentation revealed that among patients with and without obesity receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer, alpha- and beta-diversity analyses did not identify significant GI microbiome differences based on obesity.

Findings from the presentation revealed that among patients with and without obesity receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer, alpha- and beta-diversity analyses did not identify significant GI microbiome differences based on obesity.

The effects of obesity-related gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome alterations and their impact on symptom burden may be outweighed by the effects of chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer, according to findings from a poster presentation at the 50th Annual Oncology Nursing Society Conference.1

Findings from the presentation revealed that among patients with and without obesity receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer, alpha- and beta-diversity analyses did not identify significant GI microbiome differences based on obesity. Furthermore, no significant differences in symptom burden were observed between patients with and without obesity.

Additionally, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis identified 8 bacteria significantly enriched in patients with breast cancer and obesity: Collinsella aerofacien, Prevotella 7, Coprobacillus cateniformis, Ruminococcus torques group, Agathobacter, Frisingicoccus, Roseburia inulinivorans, and Monoglobus pectinilyticus.

Functional analyses of these bacteria established that they were responsible for the severity of neurologic symptoms in patients with breast cancer, as well as pro-inflammatory effects in colorectal cancers. Additionally, the results from this study contrast with findings from a recent meta-analysis published in BMC Microbiology and Infectious Disease, which showed that patients with obesity saw a significant decrease in the richness and diversity of gut bacteria.2

“Identifying biologic mechanisms driving symptoms is necessary for the development of therapies to reduce cancer-related symptom burden,” Catherine Cherwin, PhD, RN, assistant professor of Nursing at the Iowa College of Nursing, wrote with study coinvestigators.1 “While obesity may alter the GI microbiome and influence symptom burden in women with breast cancer, these effects may be outweighed by the effects of chemotherapy on the gut.”

The study included women who were obese or not obese receiving taxane-based chemotherapy for breast cancer. Women were classified as obese if they had BMI of 30 or greater. Patients were recruited while receiving chemotherapy on the first day of a cycle at an outpatient chemotherapy clinic and provided a stool sample and symptom reports at 1 week following treatment.

Symptoms were assessed via the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), which records the occurrence, frequency (1-4), severity (1-4), and distress of symptoms (0-4) of 32 possible symptoms in the week following chemotherapy. Symptom burden was analyzed as the average ratings for frequency, severity, and distress, as well as for individual symptoms. T-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare symptom burden between patients with and without obesity.

The study was initiated to compare symptom reports and GI microbiome composition between obese vs non-obese populations with breast cancer to identify microbial influences for symptom severity. Historically, patients with obesity and breast cancer experienced higher symptom burden, reduced treatment efficacy, and increased mortality vs those who were not obese. Additionally, obesity is associated with changes in the GI microbiome, which has been shown to regulate gut health through the regulation of epithelial integrity, GI mucus degradation, and GI inflammation.

Among patients with breast cancer identified as obese (n = 26) and non-obese (n = 33), the average age was 57.96 years (SD, 11.34) vs 47.48 (SD, 13.03). Additionally, among the respective groups, the mean BMI was 35.44 (SD, 5.71) vs 25.07 (SD, 3.03), 81% vs 97% were White, and 96% vs 94% were non-Hispanic. Additionally, 62% vs 82% had stage I or II breast cancer.

Regarding symptom reports, among the respective groups, the mean symptom occurrence was 13.76 (SD, 7.88) vs 13.12 (SD, 5.21). The mean symptom frequency was 1.93 (SD, 0.36) vs 2.02 (SD, 0.43), and the mean symptom severity was 1.93 (SD, 0.36) vs 1.91 (SD, 0.40). Furthermore, the mean symptom distress was 1.65 (SD, 0.63) vs 1.74 (SD, 0.59) in the obese and non-obese groups, respectively.

References

  1. Cherwin C, Hoang J, Roberts E, Mangalam A. Gut microbiome and symptom burden in obese and non-obese women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Presented at the 50th Annual Oncology Nursing Society Conference; April 9-13, 2025; Denver, CO. Poster RS67.
  2. Hu X, Yu C, He Y, et al. Integrative metagenomic analysis reveals distinct gut microbial signatures related to obesity. BMC Microbiol. 2024;24(119). doi:10.1186/s12866-024-03278-5

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Subscribe Now!
Recent Videos
Related Content

A statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in patients who received second-line therapy.

Cisplatin/Carboplatin Plus Etoposide Yield Similar Real-World Efficacy in ES-SCLC

Tim Cortese
September 16th 2025
Article

Upfront risk stratification for additional cardiovascular testing may help mitigate cardiovascular toxicities in breast cancer treatment.

Cardiovascular Considerations in Breast Cancer Treatment and Survivorship

Joseph S. Wallins, MD, MPH
September 16th 2025
Podcast

Numerically higher ORRs were reported in those who received treatment in the second line vs third line, in those with a CTFI of 90 days or more, and those without CNS metastasis.

Lurbinectedin Yields Responses in Various ES-SCLC Subgroups

Tim Cortese
September 16th 2025
Article

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
September 16th 2025
Podcast

All efficacy-evaluable patients with ES-SCLC treated with surufatinib, durvalumab, etoposide, and chemotherapy responded to treatment.

Surufatinib Combo Displays Promising Efficacy in Frontline ES-SCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
September 16th 2025
Article

The second takeaway is that the type of responses and efficacy that we have seen with these combinations rival what we have in our standard of care armamentarium.

How Promising Are Immunotherapy Combos in Indolent Lymphoma?

Tim Cortese
September 16th 2025
Article
Related Content

A statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in patients who received second-line therapy.

Cisplatin/Carboplatin Plus Etoposide Yield Similar Real-World Efficacy in ES-SCLC

Tim Cortese
September 16th 2025
Article

Upfront risk stratification for additional cardiovascular testing may help mitigate cardiovascular toxicities in breast cancer treatment.

Cardiovascular Considerations in Breast Cancer Treatment and Survivorship

Joseph S. Wallins, MD, MPH
September 16th 2025
Podcast

Numerically higher ORRs were reported in those who received treatment in the second line vs third line, in those with a CTFI of 90 days or more, and those without CNS metastasis.

Lurbinectedin Yields Responses in Various ES-SCLC Subgroups

Tim Cortese
September 16th 2025
Article

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
September 16th 2025
Podcast

All efficacy-evaluable patients with ES-SCLC treated with surufatinib, durvalumab, etoposide, and chemotherapy responded to treatment.

Surufatinib Combo Displays Promising Efficacy in Frontline ES-SCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
September 16th 2025
Article

The second takeaway is that the type of responses and efficacy that we have seen with these combinations rival what we have in our standard of care armamentarium.

How Promising Are Immunotherapy Combos in Indolent Lymphoma?

Tim Cortese
September 16th 2025
Article
Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

259 Prospect Plains Rd, Bldg H,
Monroe, NJ 08831

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.