Patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma had high rates of response and overall survival with axicabtagene ciloleucel at an updated analysis of the ZUMA-5 trial.
Updated findings from the phase 2 ZUMA-5 trial (NCT03105336) that were presented at the 63rd American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition showed that axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; Yescarta) use in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) was successful in extending survival and elevating response rates.
Among patients who were evaluable for efficacy (n = 110), the median overall survival (OS) was not reached and the 24-month OS was 79.1%.1
“Overall, these results indicate that axi-cel is a highly effective therapeutic approach for patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma,” said Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, deputy director of the lymphoma/melanoma department at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. He presented the findings and added that axi-cel “demonstrates substantial and continued benefit” in this patient population.
As of the March 31, 2021, data cut-off, the median follow-up in the FL group was 30.9 months (range, 24.7-44.3) and 23.8 months in the MZL group (range, 7.4-39.4).
The overall response rate (ORR) in the FL cohort (n = 86) was 94%, including a 79% complete response (CR) rate. In the MZL group (n = 24), the ORR was 83% with a 63% CR rate.
“This higher response rate translated to good durability,” Neelapu said. “The estimated median duration of response for the follicular lymphoma cohort was approximately 39 months and it was not reached for the marginal zone lymphoma cohort.”
The FDA approved axi-cel for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory FL following 2 or more lines of systemic therapy in March 2021 based on previous data from ZUMA-5. The CAR T-cell product elicited a response in 91% of patients with relapsed/refractory FL (n = 81) including a CR of 60%. Notably, 74% of patients had a continued remission at 18 months.2
ZUMA-5 is a multicenter, single-arm study of patients with relapsed/refractory iNHL who previously received 2 or more lines of systemic therapy, including treatment with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an alkylating agent. The primary end point was ORR per central review. Key secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety.
To be eligible for enrollment, patients had to have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Participants underwent leukapheresis and received conditioning chemotherapy followed by an infusion of axi-cel at 2 × 106 CAR T-cells/kg.
In the primary analysis (N = 104) presented at ASH in 2020 after a median follow-up of 17.5 months, the ORR was 92% with a CR rate of 76%.3
In these updated findings, the median PFS was 39.6 months (95% CI, 25.7-not estimable [NE]) in the FL group with a 24-month PFS of 63.4% (95% CI, 51.6%-73.0%). In the MZL group, the median PFS was 17.3 months (95% CI, 9.2-NE) and the 24-month PFS was 47.4% (95% CI, 23.1%-68.4%).
Investigators evaluated efficacy outcomes in 78 patients with FL by progression of disease within 24 months from initiation of anti-CD20–containing chemotherapy (POD24) status. In patients with POD24 (n = 49), the median DOR was 38.6 months (95% CI, 14.5-NE) with a 24-month DOR of 61.1% (95% CI, 44.3%-74.3%) compared with not reached (95% CI, 24.7-NE) and 72.4% (95% CI, 50.2%-85.9%), respectively, in those without POD24 (n = 29).
The median PFS was 39.6 months (95% CI, 13.1-NE) and the median OS was not reached (95% CI, 39.6-NE) with POD24 vs not reached (95% CI, 25.7-NE) and not reached (95% CI, NE-NE), respectively, without POD24.
The 24-month PFS was 57.3 months (95% CI, 41.2-70.4) and the 24-month OS was 77.6% (95% CI, 63.1%-86.9%) with POD24 vs 73.0% (95% CI, 51.1%-86.2%) and 85.9% (95% CI, 66.7%-94.5%), respectively, without POD24.
“The efficacy outcomes in patients with POD24 were quite consistent with all efficacy eligible patients,” Neelapu said. He added that POD24 results were consistent across key prognostic subgroups, including patients older than 65 years, those who had high tumor burden by GELF criteria, those who were refractory to last previous therapy, or who had prior stem cell transplantation, or prior exposure to lenalidomide, a BTK inhibitor, or a PI3 kinase inhibitor.
Neelapu said the updated safety results were consistent with previous findings. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (33%), decreased neutrophil count (28%), and anemia (25%).
There were only 2 incidents of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) observed after data cutoff for the primary analysis; both in the MZL group and both were grade 1/2. Similarly, there were only 2 incidents of neurologic events observed after the primary analysis; both in the MZL group and both were grade 1/2.
“As of the date of the data cutoff, most CRS cases and neurological events have resolved,” Neelapu said.
Six patients died of infections following data cutoff for the primary analysis. Three were related to axi-cel or conditioning therapy.